аЯрЁБс>ўџ ')ўџџџ&џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџьЅСq Пbjbjt+t+ AA џџџџџџ]–––––––ЊЊЊЊЊ ЖЊ% Жооооооооъьььььь$л єЯ Š –ооооо 0––ооо000ою–о–оъЊЊ––––оъ0К0ъ––ъов рbхwOТЊЊЬdъ Symposium on “The Doha Development Agenda and Beyond” Functioning of the АФУХСљКЯВЪЙйЭјзЪСЯ, 30 April 2002. Speaking notes – Ambassador Kхre Bryn I. GC Chairman experience in 2000 1) Situation seen in light of Seattle and selection of DsG. Confidence building and consolidation. Consensus: point of departure – how to reach it – improvise, no fixed rules, gut feeling. 2) Problems and successes: Election of chair for committee on agriculture. Implementation. Selection of Appellate Body members. Decision on venue for 4th Ministerial. 3) Internal transparency: First conclusions after Seattle: No need for fundamental reforms. Don’t touch the consensus principle. Consultations practices developed after Seattle: I. Consultations in smaller groups must be announced to everybody in advance; II. Members can ask to be included if they so wish; II. Information to open-ended meetings after consultations in smaller groups; IV. Decisions only taken in open-ended meetings. 4) Up to a certain point this system has worked well, ref. preparation of Doha Declaration. Must be strengthened and supplemented. II. Reasons for problems in functioning 1) Character of the organizations. Contractual set of agreements between Members. АФУХСљКЯВЪЙйЭјзЪСЯ is the book! 2) Problems closely linked to difficult and substantive problems. Problems tend to be exaggerated. 3) АФУХСљКЯВЪЙйЭјзЪСЯ different from the GATT (rules, membership, dispute settlement). Nostalgia for the past. Many GATT experts have no experience from the UN or the Bretton Woods institution. Increase in membership has resulted in clash of old GATT and UN cultures. 4) Young organization lacking institutional experience and memory. 50 year old and 5 year old. III. Further adaptations of governance system needed. 1) Consultation principles mentioned could be further refined and institutionalised. Guarantee that they will be followed – guidelines. 2) Guidelines for specific purposes which in some cases could entail even special voting provisions. - Selection of DG - Selection of Appellate Body members - Annual selection of chairs Conclusion: Building of institutional practice and memory. 3) Need for a consultative body based on constituency system where all Members are represented. Not taking decisions, not excluding participation of interested groups on relevant issues. - Constituency groups - Interest groups 4) Political process leading up to Ministerial Conferences and conduct of business during the Minister Conference must follow and respect the same principles as the day to day work in Geneva. That is not the situation today. …‰ŒЊЋPUyЂ Ї з и њїѓњѓїяїѓњїѓњѓїH*mH 5mH mH  5>*mH 7…†‡ˆ‰ЋЌшij…ЕХъ,M“ФJ˜ќќќњњњњњііђђњюшђђђњфђђђррр„с„Ф„„Ф„С„с„С$7…†‡ˆ‰ЋЌшij…ЕХъ,M“ФJ˜ЩЪ&MNOPyzн @ Š ? ‚ ž Ÿ   Ё Ђ и й a b Ч й џ  W X  ) ; < =˜ЩЪ&MNOPyzн @ Š ? ‚ ž Ÿ   Ё Ђ и й a b ћїёэщщщчссїлїэїлеееечщёб„С„Ф„Ф„Ф„„с„уў„С„с„с„фў„Ф„сb Ч й џ  W X  ) ; < љѕѕѕѕёљѕѕяљ„С„с„с„фў А‚. АЦA!А‰"А‰#‰$‰%А [(@ёџ(NormalCJmH<A@ђџЁ<Default Paragraph Font џџџџ˜b   ‰Š,12=>CMOPT“ ЁЊЋДФХЭЯав$&*+-ЂЅЇЎЏКЇЇ †ˆ,L“УЪ%&LЂЇ}ЇЇ џџVibeke UnderhillAC:\temp\AutoRecovery save of NGO 30 April 2002.doc speaking notesVibeke UnderhillAC:\temp\AutoRecovery save of NGO 30 April 2002.doc speaking notesVibeke UnderhillAC:\temp\AutoRecovery save of NGO 30 April 2002.doc speaking notesVibeke UnderhillJ\\DRIFT-GEN\vju\Dok\WORDDATA\WTO\NGO 30 April 2002.doc speaking notes..docVibeke UnderhillAC:\temp\AutoRecovery save of NGO 30 April 2002.doc speaking notesVibeke UnderhillJ\\DRIFT-GEN\vju\Dok\WORDDATA\WTO\NGO 30 April 2002.doc speaking notes..docVibeke UnderhillJ\\DRIFT-GEN\vju\Dok\WORDDATA\WTO\NGO 30 April 2002.doc speaking notes..docVibeke UnderhillJ\\DRIFT-GEN\vju\Dok\WORDDATA\WTO\NGO 30 April 2002.doc speaking notes..docVibeke UnderhillJ\\DRIFT-GEN\vju\Dok\WORDDATA\WTO\NGO 30 April 2002.doc speaking notes..doc Administrator3C:\WINNT\Profiles\Moris\Desktop\paper_kare_bryn.docџ@€Ѕm. А@G‡ŸTimes New Roman5€Symbol3& ‡ŸArial"1ˆФЉјуeFјуeFткe&vW$ЅРДД€0d= џџ30 April 2002  NGOVibeke Underhill Administratorўџр…ŸђљOhЋ‘+'Гй0 ˜ МШф№ќ (4 P \ h t€ˆ˜ф30 April 2002 – NGO0 AVibeke UnderhillGOibeibe Normal.dotrAdministratorll2miMicrosoft Word 8.0@@єŠЁaТ@XЮeOТ@XЮeOТvWўџеЭеœ.“—+,љЎDеЭеœ.“—+,љЎT hp˜ Ј АИРШ а №фUtenriksdepartementet = 1 30 April 2002 – NGO Title˜ 6> _PID_GUIDфAN{D8C9DEC2-6742-11D6-9830-00300525DF2D} ўџџџўџџџўџџџ !"#$%ўџџџ§џџџ(ўџџџўџџџўџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџRoot Entryџџџџџџџџ РFгнwOТ`ВїwOТ*€1TableџџџџџџџџџџџџWordDocumentџџџџџџџџSummaryInformation(џџџџDocumentSummaryInformation8џџџџџџџџџџџџCompObjџџџџjObjectPoolџџџџџџџџџџџџ`ВїwOТ`ВїwOТџџџџџџџџџџџџўџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџўџ џџџџ РFMicrosoft Word Document MSWordDocWord.Document.8є9Вq