ŠĻą”±į>ž’  ž’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’ģ„Į@ ųæ)­bjbjīFīF ešŒ,Œ,ķ˜£’’’’’’ˆ^^^(† ¦¦¦$ŹzzzPbzD¦zÄŹbĮöv{VĢ}L~~~~ …,L‡įĄćĄćĄćĄćĄćĄćĄ$XĀRŖÄRĮ¦…¦~~…¦…¦Į¦¦~~ĮĆ«Ć«Ć«…¦č¦~¦~įĄĆ«…¦įĄĆ«Ć«ĀÕøø¦¦Ł¾~j{ ą)•q¼”ÄzmŖ܍¾&æĢ2Į0bĮ³¾&üÄI«^üÄLŁ¾ŹŹ¦¦¦¦üĦŁ¾<dˆŠ 4’Ć«6™œŅž³dˆdˆdˆĮĮŹŹÄ5ŽF„3§«ŹŹŽF Annex N REQUEST FOR CONSULTATIONS AND REQUEST FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A PANEL ContentsPageAnnex N-1 Request for Consultations by BrazilN-2Annex N-2 Request for the Establishment of a Panel by BrazilN-11 ANNEX N-1 World Trade OrganizationWT/DS267/1 G/L/571 G/SCM/D49/1 G/AG/GEN/54 3 October 2002(02-5314)Original: English united states – subsidies on upland cotton Request for Consultations by Brazil The following communication, dated 27 September 2002, from the Permanent Mission of Brazil to the Permanent Mission of the United States and to the Chairman of the Dispute Settlement Body, is circulated in accordance with Article 4.4 of the DSU. _______________ Upon instruction from my authorities, the Government of Brazil hereby requests consultations with the Government of the United States pursuant to Articles 4.1, 7.1 and 30 of the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM Agreement), Article 19 of the Agreement on Agriculture, Article XXII of GATT 1994 and Article 4 of the Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes (DSU). The measures that are the subject of this request are prohibited and actionable subsidies provided to US producers, users and/or exporters of upland cotton, as well as legislation, regulations, statutory instruments and amendments thereto providing such subsidies (including export credits), grants, and any other assistance to the US producers, users and exporters of upland cotton ("US upland cotton industry"). The measures include the following: – Domestic support subsidies provided to the US upland cotton industry during marketing years 1999-2002; – Export subsidies provided to the US upland cotton industry during marketing years 19992002; – Subsidies provided contingent upon the use of US upland cotton; – Subsidies and domestic support provided under the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 (FSRIA), including the regulations, administrative procedures and other measures implementing FSRIA related to marketing loans, loan deficiency payments (LDPs), commodity certificates, direct payments, counter-cyclical payments, conservation payments (to the extent they exceed the costs of complying with such programs), Step 2 certificate program payments, export credit guarantees, and any other provisions of FSRIA that provide direct or indirect support to the US upland cotton industry; – Subsidies and domestic support provided under the Agricultural Risk Protection Act of 2000 and any other measures that provide subsidies relating to crop, disaster or other types of insurance to the US upland cotton industry; – Subsidies and domestic support provided under the Federal Agricultural Improvement and Reform Act (FAIR Act) of 1996, and programs under the FAIR Act or amendments thereto relating to marketing loans, loan deficiency payments, commodity certificates, production flexibility contract payments, conservation payments, Step 2 certificate program payments, export credit guarantees, and any other FAIR Act provisions providing direct or indirect support to the US upland cotton industry; – Export subsidies, exporter assistance, export credit guarantees, export and market access enhancement to facilitate the export of US upland cotton provided under the Agricultural Trade Act of 1978, as amended, and other measures such as the GSM-102, GSM-103, and SCGP programs, and the Step 1 and Step 2 certificate programs, among others; – Subsidies provided to the US upland cotton industry under the Agricultural Act of 1949 as amended; – Export subsidies provided to exporters of US upland cotton under the FSC Repeal and Extraterritorial Income Exclusion Act of 2000 ("ETI Act"); – Subsidies provided under the Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration and Related Agencies Appropriation Act of 2002 (November 2001), the Crop Year 2001 Agricultural Economic Assistance Act (August 2001), the Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act of 2001 (October 2000), the Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act of 2000 (October 1999), and the Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act of 1999 (October 1998); – All subsidies or support measures benefiting upland cotton that have trade-distorting effects or effects on production by the US upland cotton industry, or that have an effect of providing price support for upland cotton, or that are otherwise not exempt from the reduction commitments of the United States, as described in Annex 2 of the Agreement on Agriculture, because they do not meet the policy-specific criteria and conditions set out in paragraphs 2-13 of Annex II of the Agreement on Agriculture (i.e. they are not so-called green box subsidies); – Export subsidies, domestic support, and other subsidies provided under regulations, administrative procedures, administrative practices and any other present measures, amendments thereto, or future measures implementing any of the measures listed above, that provide for or facilitate the payment of domestic support, export subsidies, and other subsidies for the production, use and/or export of US upland cotton and upland cotton products. The Government of Brazil considers that these measures are inconsistent with the obligations of the United States under the following provisions: 1. Article 5(c) of the SCM Agreement; 2. Article 6.3(b), (c) and (d) of the SCM Agreement; 3. Article 3.1(a) of the SCM Agreement including item (j) of the Illustrative List of Export Subsidies in Annex I thereto; 4. Article 3.1(b) of the SCM Agreement; 5. Article 3.2 of the SCM Agreement; 6. Article 3.3 of the Agreement on Agriculture; 7. Article 7.1 of the Agreement on Agriculture; 8. Article 8 of the Agreement on Agriculture; 9. Article 9.1 of the Agreement on Agriculture; 10. Article 10.1 of the Agreement on Agriculture; and 11. Article III:4 of GATT 1994. Brazil is of the view that the US statutes, regulations, and administrative procedures listed above are inconsistent with these provisions as such and as applied. The United States has no basis to assert a defense under Article 13(b)(ii) of the Agreement on Agriculture that the domestic support measures listed above are exempt from action based on Articles 5 and 6 of the SCM Agreement, because these measures provide support to upland cotton in marketing years 1999-2002 in excess of the support decided by the United States in the 1992 marketing year. Similarly, the United States has no basis to assert a defense under Article 13(c)(ii) of the Agreement on Agriculture that the export subsidies listed above are exempt from action based on Article 3, 5 and 6 of the SCM Agreement, because these export subsidies do not conform fully to the provisions of Part V of the Agreement on Agriculture, as reflected in the Schedule of the United States. The measures listed above are subsidies because in each instance there is a financial contribution by the US government, or an income or price support in the sense of Article XVI of GATT 1994, and a benefit is thereby conferred within the meaning of Article 1.1(a) and (b) of the SCM Agreement. Each of the listed subsidies is specific to US producers of primary agricultural products and/or to the upland cotton industry within the meaning of Articles 2.1 and 2.3 of the SCM Agreement. The use of these measures causes adverse effects, i.e. serious prejudice to the interests of Brazil: – The effect of the measures is significant price depression and price suppression in the markets for upland cotton in Brazil and elsewhere during marketing years 1999-2002 in violation of SCM Articles 5(c) and 6.3(c). – The effect of the measures is to displace or impede exports of Brazilian upland cotton in third country markets during marketing years 1999-2002, in violation of Articles 5(c) and 6.3(b) of the SCM Agreement. – The effect of the measures is to increase the world market share of the United States for upland cotton in marketing year 2001 as compared to the average share of the United States between marketing years between 1998-2000, and by increasing its world market share for the production of upland cotton in the period from marketing year 1985 (the first year in which LDP and marketing loan payments were made for upland cotton) to marketing year 2001 from 16.7 to 20.6 percent in violation of Articles 5(c) and 6.3(d) of the SCM Agreement. The statutes, regulations, and administrative measures listed above and the subsidies they mandate threaten ( as such and as applied ( to cause serious prejudice to the interests of Brazil as follows: – By mandating conditions that will result in continued depressed and suppressed upland cotton prices for marketing years 2002 through 2007 through the guaranteed payment of subsidies to the US upland cotton industry, which artificially increases and/or maintains high-cost US upland cotton production in violation of SCM Articles 5(c) and 6.3(c); and – By mandating conditions that will result in over-production of high-cost US upland cotton, which will continue to displace and impede Brazil's export market share in the world market and specific national markets for upland cotton, in violation of SCM Articles 5(c) and 6.3(b). With respect to the Step 2 program, Brazil believes that the program as such and as applied to provide payments to exporters of US upland cotton is inconsistent with Articles 3.3, 8, 9.1, and 10.1 of the Agreement on Agriculture, and with Articles 3.1(a) and 3.2 of the SCM Agreement. Brazil further believes that the program, as such and as applied to provide payments to US domestic mill users of US upland cotton, are inconsistent with Article 3.1(b) of the SCM Agreement, and Article III:4 of GATT 1994. Step 2 payments are actionable subsidies for the purpose of Brazil's claims under Articles 5 and 6.3 of the SCM Agreement. Regarding export credit guarantees, export and market access enhancement provided under the Agricultural Trade Act of 1978, as amended, and other measures such as the GSM-102, GSM-103, and SCGP programs, Brazil is of the view that these programs, as applied and as such, violate Articles 3.3, 8, 9.1, and 10.1 of the Agreement on Agriculture and are prohibited export subsidies under Article 3.1(a) and item (j) of the Illustrative List of Export Subsidies included as Annex I to the SCM Agreement. Subsidies provided under these programs are also actionable subsidies for the purpose of Brazil's claims under Article 6.3 of the SCM Agreement. Articles 4.2 and 7.2 of the SCM Agreement together require that this request for consultations include a statement of available evidence (1) with regard to the existence and nature of the subsidies in question and (2) the adverse effects and serious prejudice to the interests of Brazil. This letter identifies the existence and nature of the subsidies, and further evidence is provided in the annex to this letter. The Government of Brazil reserves the right to request the United States to produce information and documents regarding the measures in question and thir effect on the interests of Brazil, during the consultation process. The Government of Brazil also reserves the right to address additional measures and claims under other °ÄĆÅĮłŗĻ²Ź¹ŁĶų׏ĮĻ provisions during the course of the consultations. My authorities look forward to receiving in due course a reply from the United States to this request. Brazil is ready to consider with the United States mutually convenient dates to hold consultations in Geneva. ANNEX Statement of Available Evidence With Regard to the Existence and Nature of the Subsidies in Question and the Serious Prejudice Caused to the Interest of Brazil 1. Brazil's request for consultations dated 27 September 2002 identifies the prohibited and actionable subsidies that are the subject of this request for consultations. 2. The evidence set out below is evidence available to Brazil at this time regarding the existence and nature of those subsidies, and the adverse effects caused by them to the interests of Brazil. It reflects the presently available evidence regarding the claims reflected in Brazil's request for consultations and is supported by documents that are described and set out in United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and non-governmental internet locations set out in paragraph 4 below. Brazil reserves the right to supplement or alter this list in the future, as required. 3. The evidence presently available to Brazil includes the following: – US producers of upland cotton received domestic support in excess of 100 percent of the US crop value in marketing year 2001; – US domestic and export support subsidies to upland cotton in marketing year 2001 exceeded $4 billion – far greater than the value of total US production; – Compared with marketing year 1992, US Government subsidies to US producers of upland cotton have increased significantly, particularly for the 1999 and 2001 marketing year; – The provisions of the 2002 Farm Bill mandate the payment of subsidies considerably in excess of those provided in the 1996 FAIR Act, including a new counter-cyclical payment program providing for more than $1 billion for marketing year 2002 at current market prices for upland cotton. The 2002 Farm Bill provides similar (although increased) payments as the FAIR act in the form of a "direct payment" program (a successor to production flexibility payments) and continues largely unchanged the loan deficiency payments, marketing loans payments, crop insurance payments, and the Step 2 program and other export subsidy programs that provided support to the US upland cotton industry prior to passage of the 2002 Farm Bill; – For a significant number of US producers of upland cotton, total cost of production in 2001 (and from 1991 through 2000) was well above the US market price of upland cotton; – Thus, without the benefit of US domestic and export subsidies, many US producers would not be able to produce upland cotton without sustaining a significant loss; current price projections for marketing years 2003-2007 indicate that US upland cotton prices are expected to remain well below the US cost of production; – With upland cotton prices declining over the 4-year period from 1998 through 2001, US production increased from 14 million tons in marketing year 1998 to a record 20.3 million metric tons in marketing year 2001; – In marketing year 2001 the United States was the world's largest exporter of upland cotton, with a 38 percent share. It is expected that the United States will remain by far the world's largest exporter of upland cotton in marketing year 2002; – The volume of US exports of US upland cotton increased significantly from 946.000 metric tons in marketing year 1998 to 1.829.000 metric tons in marketing year 2001, with 1.960.000 metric tons expected to be exported in marketing year 2002; – The effect of the US subsidies over the period of marketing years 1999-2001 was an increase in production of US upland cotton, an increase in US exports, and a corresponding significant decrease in Brazilian, world, and US prices of upland cotton; – US year-end surplus stocks of upland cotton in marketing year 2001 increased steadily between marketing years 1999-2001 with the additional surplus creating a depressing and suppressing effect on US and world prices; – Brazilian upland cotton is like or has characteristics closely resembling US upland cotton, is used interchangeably by customers in third country markets with US upland cotton and competes in the same markets for the same customers. Thus, the overproduction of US upland cotton suppresses and depresses the price that Brazilian producers can obtain for their upland cotton on the world and Brazilian market; – Prices for upland cotton in Brazil follow trends created in the US and Northern European markets and experienced significant declines between marketing years 1999-2002; – Brazilian production of upland cotton decreased between marketing year 2000 and 2001 from 939.000 to 718.000 metric tons; – Prices for upland cotton in the Brazilian, worldwide, and other regional and third country markets were significantly depressed and suppressed over the period of marketing years 1999-2002 as a result of the effect of US subsidies; – Prices for upland cotton in the Brazilian, worldwide, and other regional and third country markets continue to be suppressed in marketing year 2002 as a result of US subsidies; – The world market share of the United States for upland cotton in marketing year 2001 increased over the average share of the United States between marketing years 1998-2000. In addition, the United States increased its world market share for the production of upland cotton in the period from marketing year 1985 (the first year in which LDP and marketing loan payments were made for upland cotton) to marketing year 2001 from 16.7 to 20.6 percent; – The United States' notifications of subsidies to the °ÄĆÅĮłŗĻ²Ź¹ŁĶų׏ĮĻ Committee on Agriculture provide information indicating that the loan deficiency payments (LDP), marketing loan gains, crop insurance programs, marketing loss payments, and Step 2 certificate payments made in connection with upland cotton are not "green" box payments; – USDA econometric analyses demonstrate the actual or potential production enhancing effects for particular crops in the United States of LDP, marketing loan payments, crop insurance subsidies, and even production flexibility payments. Certain of these studies demonstrate the production enhancing effects of such subsidies on US production of upland cotton; – Econometric studies by the International Cotton Advisory Committee, the World Bank, and the International Monetary Fund demonstrate that many of the US subsidies at issue in the consultation request have a price suppressive and depressive effect on prices of upland cotton and other crops; – The US Step 1 and Step 2 programs, since their origin and up to the present, enhance the export competitiveness of US-produced upland cotton -- an effect consistent with the expressed purpose of such programs; – US export credit guarantee programs have caused serious prejudice to Brazilian upland cotton producers by providing below-market financing benefits for the export of competing US upland cotton; – US export credit guarantee programs, since their origin in 1980 and up the present, provide premium rates that are inadequate to cover the long-term operating costs and losses of the programs; in particular there were losses caused by large-scale defaults totalling billions of dollars that have not been reflected in increased premiums to cover such losses; – The volume of production and export of lower-cost Brazilian upland cotton have been impeded by US subsidies that have built and maintained excess US production by higher-cost US producers; – The estimated losses suffered by Brazil due to price suppressed or depressed by US subsidies to the US upland cotton industry are well in excess of $ 600 million for marketing year 2001 alone including lost revenue, lost production, losses of related services, lost federal and state revenue, higher unemployment and losses in Brazil's trade balance. 4. The statistics, data and analytic documents supporting the summary of evidence above can be found in the following documents published by among others the US Department of Agriculture, the International Cotton Advisory Committee and the Food and Agriculture Policy Research Institute, University of Missouri as well as others: US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service:  HYPERLINK http://www.ers.usda.gov http://www.ers.usda.gov – Comparison and Summary of 1996 and 2002 farm bills  HYPERLINK http://www.ers.usda.gov/Features/farmbill/titles/titleIcommodities.htm#c http://www.ers.usda.gov/Features/farmbill/titles/titleIcommodities.htm#c – Briefing on Cotton  HYPERLINK http://www.ers.usda.gov/briefing/cotton/ http://www.ers.usda.gov/briefing/cotton/ – Cotton and Wool Outlook: Various Editions  HYPERLINK http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/so/view.asp?f=field/cws-bb/ http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/so/view.asp?f=field/cws-bb/ – Factors Affecting the US Farm Price for Upland Cotton, Cotton and Wool Situation and Outlook, April 1998 – Cotton and Wool Outlook: Latest Statistical Information  HYPERLINK http://www.ers.usda.gov/briefing/cotton/Data/data.htm http://www.ers.usda.gov/briefing/cotton/Data/data.htm – Statistical Information of the Cotton and Wool Yearbook  HYPERLINK http://www.ers.usda.gov/data/sdp/view.asp?f=crops/89004/ http://www.ers.usda.gov/data/sdp/view.asp?f=crops/89004/ – 1996 FAIR Act Frames Farm Policy for 7 Years  HYPERLINK "http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/agoutlook/aosupp.pdf" http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/agoutlook/aosupp.pdf – US Farm Program Benefits: Links to Planting Decisions & Agricultural Markets  HYPERLINK "http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/agoutlook/oct2000/ao275e.pdf" http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/agoutlook/oct2000/ao275e.pdf – Production and Price Impacts of US Crop Insurance Subsidies: Some Preliminary Results  HYPERLINK "http://www.ers.usda.gov/briefing/FarmPolicy/ffc_insurrance.pdf" http://www.ers.usda.gov/briefing/FarmPolicy/ffc_insurrance.pdf – Commodity Cost and Returns  HYPERLINK http://www.ers.usda.gov/data/costsandreturns/ http://www.ers.usda.gov/data/costsandreturns/ – Characteristics and Production Costs of US Cotton Farms  HYPERLINK http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/sb974-2/ http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/sb974-2/ – Analysis of the US Commodity Loan Program with Marketing Loan Provisions  HYPERLINK http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/aer801/aer801fm.pdf http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/aer801/aer801fm.pdf – Agricultural Outlook December 1999: Ag Policy: Marketing Loan Benefits Supplement Market Revenues for Farmers  HYPERLINK http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/agoutlook/dec1999/ao267b.pdf http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/agoutlook/dec1999/ao267b.pdf – Farm and Commodity Policy: 1996-2001 Program Provisions  HYPERLINK http://www.ers.usda.gov/briefing/FarmPolicy/1996malp.htm http://www.ers.usda.gov/briefing/FarmPolicy/1996malp.htm – Farm and Commodity Policy: Questions and Answers  HYPERLINK http://www.ers.usda.gov/briefing/FarmPolicy/questions/index.htm http://www.ers.usda.gov/briefing/FarmPolicy/questions/index.htm – Farm and Commodity Policy: Crop Insurance  HYPERLINK http://www.ers.usda.gov/briefing/FarmPolicy/cropInsurance.htm http://www.ers.usda.gov/briefing/FarmPolicy/cropInsurance.htm – Cotton: Background Issues for Farm Legislation  HYPERLINK http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/CWS-0601-01/ http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/CWS-0601-01/ – Cotton Policy: Special Program Provisions for Upland Cotton  HYPERLINK http://www.ers.usda.gov/briefing/cotton/specialprovisions.htm http://www.ers.usda.gov/briefing/cotton/specialprovisions.htm – List of Studies Analyzing Market Effects of US Agricultural Policy  HYPERLINK http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/tb1888/tb1888ref.pdf http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/tb1888/tb1888ref.pdf – Major Agricultural and Trade Legislation, 1933–1996  HYPERLINK http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/aib729/aib729a3.pdf http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/aib729/aib729a3.pdf US Department of Agriculture, Farm Service Agency:  HYPERLINK "http://www.fsa.usda.gov" http://www.fsa.usda.gov – Statistics on Price Support Loans and Loan Deficiency Payments  HYPERLINK "http://www.fsa.usda.gov/pscad/" http://www.fsa.usda.gov/pscad/: – FSA Fact Sheets:  HYPERLINK http://www.fsa.usda.gov/pas/publications/facts/pubfacts.htm http://www.fsa.usda.gov/pas/publications/facts/pubfacts.htm – Fact Sheet: Upland Cotton: Locking the Adjusted World Price (AWP) by Loan Deficiency Payments on Upland Seed Cotton  HYPERLINK http://www.fsa.usda.gov/pas/publications/facts/html/upcotlock00.htm http://www.fsa.usda.gov/pas/publications/facts/html/upcotlock00.htm – Price Support Programs  HYPERLINK http://www.fsa.usda.gov/dafp/psd/default.htm http://www.fsa.usda.gov/dafp/psd/default.htm – Loan Deficiency Payment and Price Support Cumulative Activity  HYPERLINK "http://www.fsa.usda.gov/pscad/answer82rnat.asp" http://www.fsa.usda.gov/pscad/answer82rnat.asp Congressional Budget Office Current Budget Projection:  HYPERLINK "http://www.cbo.gov/showdoc.cfm?index=1944&sequence=0" http://www.cbo.gov/showdoc.cfm?index=1944&sequence=0 Food and Agriculture Policy Research Institute, University of Missouri:  HYPERLINK http://www.fapri.missouri.edu/FAPRI_Publications.htm http://www.fapri.missouri.edu/FAPRI_Publications.htm International Cotton Advisory Committee:  HYPERLINK http://www.icac.org/icac/english.html http://www.icac.org/icac/english.html – Cotton: Review of the World Situation August 2002  HYPERLINK "http://www.icac.org/icac/CottonInfo/Publications/Reviews/english.html" http://www.icac.org/icac/CottonInfo/Publications/Reviews/english.html – Production and Trade Policies Affecting the Cotton Industry, November 2000 – Production and Trade Policies Affecting the Cotton Industry, September 2001 – Production and Trade Policies Affecting the Cotton Industry, July 2002  HYPERLINK "http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/NEWS/0,,contentMDK:20053593~menuPK:34463~pagePK:34370~piPK:34424~theSitePK:4607,00.html" http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/NEWS/0,,contentMDK:20053593~menuPK:34463~pagePK:34370~piPK:34424~theSitePK:4607,00.html – Cotton: World Statistics  HYPERLINK "http://www.icac.org/icac/CottonInfo/Publications/Statistics/statsws/english.html" http://www.icac.org/icac/CottonInfo/Publications/Statistics/statsws/english.html – Report from Brazil on Injury From Low Cotton Prices – Survey of Cost of Production of Raw Cotton World Trade Organization: – US notification on Domestic Support for Marketing Year 1998 - G/AG/N/USA/36 International Monetary Fund: – World Economic Outlook September 2002 http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2002/02/pdf/chapter2.pdf World Bank: – Cotton Producers Face Losses Because of Rich Country Subsidies  HYPERLINK "http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/NEWS/0,,contentMDK:20053593~menuPK:34463~pagePK:34370~piPK:34424~theSitePK:4607,00.html" http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/NEWS/0,,contentMDK:20053593~menuPK:34463~pagePK:34370~piPK:34424~theSitePK:4607,00.html __________ ANNEX N-2 World Trade OrganizationWT/DS267/7 7 February 2003(03-0838)Original: English united states – subsidies on upland cotton Request for the Establishment of a Panel by Brazil The following communication, dated 6 February 2003, from the Permanent Mission of Brazil to the Chairman of the Dispute Settlement Body, is circulated pursuant to Article 6.2 of the DSU. _______________ On 27 September, the Government of Brazil requested consultations with the Government of the United States pursuant to Articles 4.1, 7.1 and 30 of the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM Agreement), Article 19 of the Agreement on Agriculture, Article XXII of GATT 1994 and Article 4 of the Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes (DSU). This request was circulated to the °ÄĆÅĮłŗĻ²Ź¹ŁĶų׏ĮĻ Members on 3 October 2002 as document WT/DS267/1, "United States – Subsidies on Upland Cotton". Consultations were held on 3, 4 and 19 December 2002 and on 17 January 2003 with a view to reaching a mutually satisfactory solution. Unfortunately, these consultations failed to settle the dispute. The Government of Brazil therefore hereby requests that a panel be established pursuant to Articles 6 of the DSU, Article XXIII:2 of GATT 1994, Article 19 of the Agreement on Agriculture, and Articles 4.4, 7.4 and 30 of the SCM Agreement (to the extent that Article 30 incorporates by reference Article XXIII of GATT 1994). The Government of Brazil further requests that the DSB initiate the procedures provided in Annex V of the SCM Agreement pursuant to paragraph 2 of that Annex. The Government of Brazil intends to put forward suggestions as to the information that should be sought under this procedure once the panel is established. The measures that are the subject of this request are prohibited and actionable subsidies provided to US producers, users and/or exporters of upland cotton, as well as legislation, regulations and statutory instruments and amendments thereto providing such subsidies (including export credit guarantees), grants, and any other assistance to the US producers, users and exporters of upland cotton ("US upland cotton industry"). The measures include the following: Domestic support subsidies provided to the US upland cotton industry during marketing years 1999-2001; Domestic support subsidies that are mandated to be provided to the US upland cotton industry during marketing years 2002-2007; Export subsidies provided to the US upland cotton industry during marketing years 19992001; Export subsides that are mandated to be provided to the US upland cotton industry during marketing years 2002-2007; Subsidies provided contingent upon the use of US over imported upland cotton in marketing years 1999-2001 and that are mandated to be provided to the US upland cotton industry during marketing years 2002-2007; Subsidies and domestic support provided under the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 (FSRIA), including the regulations, administrative procedures and other measures implementing FSRIA related to marketing loans, loan deficiency payments (LDPs), commodity certificates, direct payments, counter-cyclical payments, conservation payments (to the extent they exceed the costs of complying with such programs), Step 2 certificate programme payments, export credit guarantees, crop insurance, and any other provisions of FSRIA that provide direct or indirect support to the US upland cotton industry; Subsidies and domestic support provided under the Agricultural Risk Protection Act of 2000 and any other measures that provide subsidies relating to crop, disaster or other types of insurance to the US upland cotton industry; Subsidies and domestic support provided under the Federal Agricultural Improvement and Reform Act (FAIR Act) of 1996, and programs under the FAIR Act or amendments thereto relating to marketing loans, loan deficiency payments, commodity certificates, production flexibility contract payments, conservation payments, Step 2 certificate programme payments, export credit guarantees, crop insurance, and any other FAIR Act provisions providing direct or indirect support to the US upland cotton industry; Export subsidies, exporter assistance, export credit guarantees, export and market access enhancement to facilitate the export of US upland cotton, and other eligible agricultural commodities as addressed herein, provided under the Agricultural Trade Act of 1978, as amended, and other measures such as the GSM-102, GSM-103, and SCGP programs, and the Step 1 and Step 2 certificate programs, among others; Subsidies provided to the US upland cotton industry under the Agricultural Act of 1949 as amended; Export subsidies provided to exporters of US upland cotton under the FSC Repeal and Extraterritorial Income Exclusion Act of 2000 ("ETI Act"); Subsidies provided under the Agricultural Assistance Act of 2003; Subsidies provided under the Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration and Related Agencies Appropriation Act of 2002 (November 2001), the Crop Year 2001 Agricultural Economic Assistance Act (August 2001), the Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act of 2001 (October 2000), the Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act of 2000 (October 1999), and the Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act of 1999 (October 1998); All subsidies or support measures benefiting upland cotton that have trade-distorting effects or effects on production by the US upland cotton industry, or that have an effect of providing price support for upland cotton, or that are otherwise not exempt from the reduction commitments of the United States, as described in Annex 2 of the Agreement on Agriculture, because they do not meet the policy-specific criteria and conditions set out in paragraphs 2-13 of Annex II of the Agreement on Agriculture (i.e. they are not so-called "green box" subsidies); Export subsidies, domestic support, and other subsidies provided under regulations, administrative procedures, administrative practices and any other present measures or future measures implementing or amending any of the measures listed above, that provide for or facilitate the payment of domestic support, export subsidies, and other subsidies for the production, use and/or export of US upland cotton and upland cotton products. The measures, and any amendments to these measures, are inconsistent with the obligations of the United States under the following provisions: 1. Article 5(a) of the SCM Agreement; 2. Article 5(c) of the SCM Agreement; 3. Article 6.3(b), (c) and (d) of the SCM Agreement; 4. Article 3.1(a) of the SCM Agreement including item (j) of the Illustrative List of Export Subsidies in Annex I thereto; 5. Article 3.1(b) of the SCM Agreement; 6. Article 3.2 of the SCM Agreement; 7. Article 3.3 of the Agreement on Agriculture; 8. Article 7.1 of the Agreement on Agriculture; 9. Article 8 of the Agreement on Agriculture; 10. Article 9.1 of the Agreement on Agriculture; 11. Article 10.1 of the Agreement on Agriculture; and 12. Article III:4 of GATT 1994 13. Article XVI.1 and Article XVI.3 of GATT 1994 The US statutes, regulations and administrative procedures and any amendments thereto listed above are inconsistent with these provisions as such and as applied. The United States has no basis to assert a defense under Article 13(b)(ii) of the Agreement on Agriculture that the domestic support measures listed above are exempt from action based on Articles 5 and 6 of the SCM Agreement, because these measures provide support to upland cotton in marketing years 1999-2001 in excess of the support decided by the United States in the 1992 marketing year. Similarly, the United States has no basis to assert a defense under Article 13(c)(ii) of the Agreement on Agriculture that the export subsidies listed above are exempt from action based on Article 3, 5 and 6 of the SCM Agreement, because these export subsidies do not conform fully to the provisions of Part V of the Agreement on Agriculture, as reflected in the Schedule of the United States. The measures listed above are subsidies because in each instance there is a financial contribution by the US government, or an income or price support in the sense of Article XVI of GATT 1994, and a benefit is thereby conferred within the meaning of Article 1.1(a) and (b) of the SCM Agreement. Each of the listed subsidies is specific to US producers of primary agricultural products and/or to the upland cotton industry within the meaning of Articles 2.1 and 2.3 of the SCM Agreement. The use of measures provided to the US upland cotton industry causes adverse effects including material injury to the Brazilian upland cotton industry under SCM Article 5(a), and serious prejudice to the interests of Brazil under SCM Article 5(c) including: The effect of the measures is significant price depression and price suppression in the markets for upland cotton in Brazil, the United States, other third country markets, and the world market during marketing years 1999-2002 in violation of SCM Articles 5(c) and 6.3(c). The effect of the measures is to displace or impede exports of Brazilian upland cotton in third country markets during marketing years 1999-2002, in violation of Articles 5(c) and 6.3(b) of the SCM Agreement. The effect of the measures is to increase the world export market share of the United States for upland cotton in marketing year 2001 as compared to the average share of the United States between marketing years 1998-2000, and by increasing its world export market share for the production of upland cotton in the period beginning with the FAIR Act in marketing year 1996 from 24 percent to 37 percent in marketing year 2001 in violation of Articles 5(c) and 6.3(d) of the SCM Agreement. The effect of the measures during marketing years 1999-2002 is to increase and maintain high levels of exports of upland cotton from the United States and to provide the United States with an inequitable share of world export trade in upland cotton in violation of Article XVI.1 and 3 of GATT 1994. The statutes, regulations, and administrative measures and any amendments thereto listed above and the actionable subsidies they mandate threaten, as such and as applied, to cause material injury to the Brazilian upland cotton industry, and serious prejudice to the interests of Brazil including: By mandating conditions that are having and will continue to result in significant suppression and depression of upland cotton prices for marketing years 2002 through 2007 through the guaranteed payment of amounts of subsidies to the US upland cotton industry, which artificially increases and/or maintains high-cost US upland cotton production in violation of SCM Articles 5(c) and 6.3(c); and By mandating conditions that will result in over-production of high-cost US upland cotton, which will continue to displace and impede Brazil's export market share in the third country markets for upland cotton, in violation of SCM Articles 5(c) and 6.3(b). By mandating conditions that will result in over-production of high-cost US upland cotton, which will increase or continue to maintain high levels of exports of upland cotton from the United States in violation of SCM Articles 5(c) and 6.3(d) and continue to result in the United States having an inequitable share of world upland cotton export trade in violation of Article XVI.1 and 3 of GATT 1994. With respect to subsidies provided under the so-called "Step 2" programmes, one type of subsidy under the programme provides payments to exporters contingent upon the export of US upland cotton and is inconsistent with Articles 3.3, 8, 9.1, and 10.1 of the Agreement on Agriculture, and with Articles 3.1(a) and 3.2 of the SCM Agreement. Another type of subsidy under the Step-2 programme provides payments to US domestic mill users contingent upon the use of US upland cotton and is inconsistent with Article 3.1(b) and 3.2 of the SCM Agreement, and Article III:4 of GATT 1994. Brazil challenges these two types of subsidies under the Step 2 programme as such and as applied. These two Step 2 subsidies are actionable for the purpose of Brazil's claims under Articles 5 and 6.3 of the SCM Agreement. Regarding export credit guarantees and export and market access enhancement provided under the Agricultural Trade Act of 1978, as amended, and export credit guarantee measures relating to eligible US agricultural commodities, such as the GSM-102, GSM-103, and SCGP programmes, these programs violate, as applied and as such, Articles 3.3, 8, 9.1, and 10.1 of the Agreement on Agriculture and are prohibited export subsidies under Articles 3.1(a), 3.2 and item (j) of the Illustrated List of Export Subsidies included as Annex I to the SCM Agreement. Subsidies provided under these programs are also actionable subsidies for the purpose of Brazil's claims under Articles 5 and 6.3 of the SCM Agreement. Brazil requests that a Panel be established with standard terms of reference, in accordance with Article 7 of the DSU. Brazil asks that this request for the establishment of a Panel be placed on the agenda for the next meeting of the Dispute Settlement Body, which is scheduled to take place on 19 February 2003.  Except with respect to export credit guarantee programs as explained below.  The "marketing" year for upland cotton runs from 1 August through 31 July. For example, marketing year 2001 started on 1 August 2001 and ended on 31 July 2002. Brazil, as does the United States in its official USDA documents, treats "marketing year" to mean the same thing as "crop year".  The adverse effects and serious prejudice and threat thereof created by the measures in the marketing years 1999-2007 also exists for the corresponding (somewhat overlapping) US fiscal years 2000-2008. The US government fiscal year runs from 1 October to 30 September. For example, the fiscal year for 2001 started on 1 October 2000 and ended on 30 September 2001.  The term "upland cotton" means raw upland cotton as well as the primary processed forms of such cotton including upland cotton lint and cottonseed. The focus of Brazil’s claims relate to upland cotton with the exception of the US export credit guarantee programs as explained below.  The "marketing" year for upland cotton runs from 1 August through 31 July. For example, marketing year 2001 started on 1 August 2001 and ended on 31 July 2002. Brazil, as does the United States in its official USDA documents, treats "marketing year" to mean the same as "crop year."  The adverse effects and serious prejudice and threat thereof created by the measures in the marketing years 1999-2007 also exists for the corresponding (somewhat overlapping) US fiscal years 2000 - 2008. The US government fiscal year runs from 1 October to 30 September. For example, the fiscal year for 2001 started on 1 October 2000 and ended on 30 September 2001. WT/DS267/R/Add.3 Page N- PAGE 10 WT/DS267/R/Add.3 Page N- PAGE 1 WT/DS267/R/Add.3 Page N- PAGE 14 WT/DS267/R/Add.3 Page N- PAGE 15   01RTcŪäåęē    1 B L P Q ” ø ³ Ć  ›œüż!·%»%+*,*D*E*666®6°6??ÕUüńüęŽęüÖüĶĮüŗ±¬ü„ üšü ü¬ü üüüü‹ü‹ü„ü„ü} } ü‹ü h\’5>* j-šh\’ h\’6jh\’0JU h\’CJ h\’5 h\’:CJ, h\’>*h\’5:CJ, h^żh\’hTc h\’5CJaJh\’5CJaJh»i£h\’5h\’CJaJh»i£h\’CJaJhTc h\’CJaJh\’0   1RST]bcżųųųóóīīāāe}kd$$If–lÖÖ0”’Y®#ÅUÖ0’’’’’’öööÖ’’Ö’’Ö’’Ö’’4Ö laöpÖ’’’’ $$Ifa$gd\’gd\’gd\’"gd\’ ķ„…¬(­žžžc‘•–ÓŲöźmöź}kd©$$If–lÖÖ0”’Y®#ÅUÖ0’’’’’’öööÖ’’Ö’’Ö’’Ö’’4Ö laöpÖ’’’’ $$Ifa$gd\’ $Ifgd\’ŲŁŚåęēó  ‚}u}}fZZ $$Ifa$gd\’$dh$Ifa$gd\’$a$gd\’gd\’}kdR$$If–lÖÖ0”’Y®#ÅUÖ0’’’’’’öööÖ’’Ö’’Ö’’Ö’’4Ö laöpÖ’’’’      1 @ ¶„™N„™™Jkdj$$If–l4”ˆ’Ö0+p# +E öÖ’’Ö’’Ö’’Ö’’4Ö laölf4 $$Ifa$gd\’$d„ž¤š$Ifa$gd\’Hkdū$$If–l4Ö0+p#`+E öÖ’’Ö’’Ö’’Ö’’4Ö laölf4@ A B L M N O ¶ŖŖdŖŖEkdL$$If–lÖ0+p#+E öÖ’’Ö’’Ö’’Ö’’4Ö laöl $$Ifa$gd\’HkdŻ$$If–l4Ö0+p# +E öÖ’’Ö’’Ö’’Ö’’4Ö laölf4O P Q e f g h i ” ·«WRRRM"gd\’gd\’Ekd&$$If–lÖ0+p#+E öÖ’’Ö’’Ö’’Ö’’4Ö laöl5 ĘŠĀ@$Ifgd\’ $$Ifa$gd\’Gkd¾$$If–l”`’Ö0+p#+E öÖ’’Ö’’Ö’’Ö’’4Ö laöl” • ¹ ŗ » ² ³ Ć Ä Å k l 23žž’BC“”yz`a÷÷ņņņņ÷ņņņņņņåņåņņņņåņåņåņ „Š„0ż^„Š`„0żgd\’gd\’$a$gd\’a¹ŗ ±² PQ ¢£Éžy”Ęö&T…»Ū܁ ņķņķņķņķņķņķķķķķņķķķķķķķķķķgd\’ „Š„0ż^„Š`„0żgd\’ ‚ ˜#™#ƒ%„%ģ%ķ%Ź&Ė& '”'½)¾)Š*‹*ė+ģ+--‚/ƒ/ 2 2¬3­3-5.5śśśśśśśķśķśķśśśķśķśśśśśśśśś „Š„0ż^„Š`„0żgd\’gd\’.566666;6t6Æ6°6±6Z7[7 9”9é9ź9j:k:;;·;ø;Ž>>??@?śśņņśņņņśśśśśśśśåśåśåśåśåś „Š„0ż^„Š`„0żgd\’$a$gd\’gd\’@?ƒ@„@ZA[ASBTBHCICEDFD#E$E¾FæFlGmGźGėGŌHÕH‰IŠINKOK˜L™LNņķņķņķņķņķņķņķņķņķņķņķņķņķņgd\’ „Š„0ż^„Š`„0żgd\’NN(O)OżOžOĀPĆP-R.RķRīROTPT›UœUÕUVVėVWbWŽW X‹XÅXAY{Yśķśķśķśķśķśķśśśśśśķśśśśķķķś „Š„0ż^„Š`„0żgd\’gd\’ÕUÖUłUśUūUVVJVKVŸV V”VéVźVWW6W7W8W`WaWWWÜWŻWŽWXXĘXĒXY Y Y?Y@Y|Y}YĮYĀYĆYūYüY-Z.ZuZvZwZ°Z±Z[[R[S[T[•[–[š[ń[=\÷óč÷ā÷ó÷ó×÷ā÷ó÷óĢ÷ā÷ó÷óĮ÷ā÷ó÷ó¶÷ā÷ó÷ó«÷ā÷ó÷ó ÷ā÷ó÷ó•÷ā÷ó÷ój h\’UjŖ h\’UjĒh\’Ujźh\’Uj÷h\’Uj4h\’Uj-h\’U h\’0J6jŠh\’Uh\’jh\’U:{YżY,Z²Z[—[ļ[\œ\]B]®]ł]{^ė^_¹_;`n`ž`*a¶aēa[b™b%cjcśśśśśōśśśśśśśēēśśśśśśśśśśś „Š„0ż^„Š`„0żgd\’$gd\’gd\’=\>°Ą?°Ą°Ø°Ą“Ź°Ą\ž\×\Ų\Ōō±Õ±Õ°ä±Õ¶Ł±Õ°Ø±Õ“Ź±Õ±Õ¬]­]ś]ū]?°÷°Ŗ°÷“”°÷²ā°÷³ś°÷ģ^ķ^:³å;³å<_}_~_ŗ_»_’_``9`:`o`p`»`¼`½`ü`ż`+a,auavawa“aµačaéa&bōģęģāģā×ģęģāģāĢģęģāģāĮģęģāģā¶ģęģāģā«ģęģāģā ģęģāģā•ģęģāģāj¹h\’UjČh\’Ujåh\’Ujšh\’Uj h\’Uj@ h\’Ujs h\’Uh\’ h\’0J6jh\’Uj„ h\’U8&b'b(bYbZbšb›bäbåbęb#c$ckclc±c²c³cģcķc%d&djdkdld¤d„dŪdÜdeeeee_e`eŒeeŽe¬e­eÄeÅe f ffIfJfĀfĆfgggWgXgsgtg¬gōģęģāģā×ģęģāģāĢģęģāģāĮģęģāģā¶ģęģāģā«ģęģāģā ģęģāģā•ģęģāģājkh\’Uj‚h\’UjÓh\’Uj0h\’UjMh\’Ujhh\’Uj{h\’Uh\’ h\’0J6jh\’Uj¦h\’U8jcīc$d¦d§dØdŪdee^e°eĆeKfĮfYgrgÜghŒhhÄh?i@iˆijj+j‡jśśśśśśśśśśśśķśśśśśśśśśśśśśś „Š„0ż^„Š`„0żgd\’gd\’¬g­g®gŚgŪghhZh[h\hŠh‹hÄhÅhii i=i>iˆi‰iÉiŹiĖi’ij+j,j]j^j_j„j…j¼j½jkkkWkXk=l>lĢlĶlĪlNmOmlmmmĖmĢmĶmnnƒn„n2oōģęģāģā×ģęģāģāĢģęģāģāĮģęģāģā¶ģęģāģā«ģęģāģā ģęģāģā•ģęģā‘āhģ^ jįh\’Ujnh\’Ujqh\’Uj“h\’UjŁh\’Ujžh\’Uj/h\’Uh\’ h\’0J6jh\’Ujdh\’U8‡j»jYk¦kōk=lPmkmnUn‚nƒn„nžnģnķn o2otouooĀoÖp×pāpćpśśśśśńśśśśśśśśśśśśśśääśÜÜ$a$gd\’ „Š„0ż^„Š`„0żgd\’„Š^„Šgd\’gd\’2o3osoĆoÄoRpSpTpŌpÕp×pćpķpļpq q qqq+q5q9q:q~q³q×qpr€rr‚r|x}xzz²ˆ·ˆk”l”ė„ģ„ķ„ī„<¦÷ķéįéÖįŠįéĖĀ»²­é¦Ėé éĖ魘éĖé˜éŽéŽé‰éŽé­é{h‚N jh‚N 0JU h\’6jh\’0JUh\’B*ph h\’CJ h\’:CJ, h\’>*h\’5:CJ, h\’5aJh\’5CJaJ h\’5 h\’0J6jō h\’Ujh\’Uh\’h\’>*B*ph’h\’B*ph’*ćpķpīpļpūpq q q q q÷ļļąŌŌ‹zŌ$d„ž¤š$Ifa$gd\’Hkdg"$$If–l4Ö0+p#`+E öÖ’’Ö’’Ö’’Ö’’4Ö laölf4 $$Ifa$gd\’$dh$Ifa$gd\’$a$gd\’$a$gd\’ q qqq)q*q+q5q“£——N——HkdI#$$If–l4Ö0+p# +E öÖ’’Ö’’Ö’’Ö’’4Ö laölf4 $$Ifa$gd\’$d„ž¤š$Ifa$gd\’JkdÖ"$$If–l4”ˆ’Ö0+p# +E öÖ’’Ö’’Ö’’Ö’’4Ö laölf45q6q7q8q9q:qNq¹­­e­W5 ĘŠĀ@$Ifgd\’Gkd*$$$If–l”`’Ö0+p#+E öÖ’’Ö’’Ö’’Ö’’4Ö laöl $$Ifa$gd\’Ekdø#$$If–lÖ0+p#+E öÖ’’Ö’’Ö’’Ö’’4Ö laölNqOqPqQqRq}q~q±q²q³qorpr€rr‚r[u\u”v¢vßw¹“““Æ“§““““§“““““““$a$gd\’"gd\’gd\’Ekd’$$$If–lÖ0+p#+E öÖ’’Ö’’Ö’’Ö’’4Ö laölßwąw²yzzœzzūzüzq{r{E|F|§~Ø~Œ„…ƒ ƒ„ƒ…ƒ„„·†čˆéˆśśķśķśķśķśķśķśķśķśķśķśķśķķś „Š„0ż^„Š`„0żgd\’gd\’鈛ŠœŠ0‹1‹W‹~‹³‹.ŒVŒ{Œ«ŒŪŒ ;qĮĀfŽgŽ}‘~‘h“i“o”p”„•ņķķķķķķņķķķķķķķķķķķķķķķķķķņgd\’ „Š„0ż^„Š`„0żgd\’„•…•W–X–B˜C˜t™u™¢š£š0œ1œ34ĒžČžī”ļ”Ƥ°¤(„)„ģ„ķ„<¦`§ÓØśķśķśķśśśķśķśķśśśśśśśśėęęęgd\’ „Š„0ż^„Š`„0żgd\’gd\’<¦=¦`§a§ÓØŌØń©ņ©««„¬…¬¬•¬–¬œ¬¬ž¬¤¬„¬§¬Ø¬©¬«¬¬¬¶¬¼¬½¬Ć¬Ä¬Å¬Ė¬Ģ¬Ķ¬Ī¬Š¬Ń¬Ö¬į¬č¬é¬ź¬š¬ń¬ó¬ō¬ö¬÷¬ż¬­ ­­­­­­ńķńķćķćķćķßŲķŲķŲĶŲĶÄĶķŲķŲķŲķŲŗ“ŗ©ŗŲķ¢žķ—Œ—ŒÄŒ—ķ—ķ—ķ—Œ—Œjh\’h‚N U h\’h‚N h;l h\’h;lh00J7mHnHu h‚N 0J7jh‚N 0J7Uh0mHnHujhTc h‚N U hTc h‚N h0jh‚N 0JUh‚N jh‚N 0JOJQJU7ÓØń©«„¬…¬©¬Ŗ¬«¬¬¬Ļ¬Š¬Ń¬õ¬ö¬÷¬­­­ ­!­"­#­$­%­śśśųģģģųŻŃųģģųŃŃųĻųĻųĶų54 5 Ę Š”C#B#gd\’5$ Ę Š”C#B#a$gd\’ 5 Ę Š”C# gd\’gd\’­­­­'­(­)­öėäąÜŲh\’h0h‚N h\’h‚N jh\’h‚N Uh0mHnHu%­&­'­(­)­żūūū4401+P:p\’<0°‚. °ĘA!° "° # $ %°° -1+:p\’<0°‚. °ĘA!° "° #Š$ %°° §$$If–!vh5ÖÅ5ÖU#vÅ#vU:V –lÖ0’’’’’’öö5ÖÅ5ÖU4ÖpÖ’’’’§$$If–!vh5ÖÅ5ÖU#vÅ#vU:V –lÖ0’’’’’’öö5ÖÅ5ÖU4ÖpÖ’’’’§$$If–!vh5ÖÅ5ÖU#vÅ#vU:V –lÖ0’’’’’’öö5ÖÅ5ÖU4ÖpÖ’’’’m$$If–l!vh5Ö+5ÖE #v+#vE :V –l4öö+Ö5Ö+5ÖE 4Öaölf4q$$If–l!vh5Ö+5ÖE #v+#vE :V –l4”ˆ’öö+Ö5Ö+5ÖE 4Öaölf4m$$If–l!vh5Ö+5ÖE #v+#vE :V –l4öö+Ö5Ö+5ÖE 4Öaölf4p$$If–l!vh5Ö+5ÖE #v+#vE :V –löö5Ö+5ÖE /Ö ’4Öaölf$$If–l!vh5Ö+5ÖE #v+#vE :V –l”`’öö5Ö+5ÖE 4Öaölb$$If–l!vh5Ö+5ÖE #v+#vE :V –löö5Ö+5ÖE 4Öaöl£DŠÉźyłŗĪŒ‚ŖK© ąÉźyłŗĪŒ‚ŖK© 2http://www.ers.usda.gov/DŠÉźyłŗĪŒ‚ŖK©  ąÉźyłŗĪŒ‚ŖK© Žhttp://www.ers.usda.gov/Features/farmbill/titles/titleIcommodities.htmcĆDŠÉźyłŗĪŒ‚ŖK© ąÉźyłŗĪŒ‚ŖK© Rhttp://www.ers.usda.gov/briefing/cotton/óDŠÉźyłŗĪŒ‚ŖK© ąÉźyłŗĪŒ‚ŖK© ‚http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/so/view.asp?f=field/cws-bb/ŻDŠÉźyłŗĪŒ‚ŖK© ąÉźyłŗĪŒ‚ŖK© lhttp://www.ers.usda.gov/briefing/cotton/Data/data.htmćDŠÉźyłŗĪŒ‚ŖK© ąÉźyłŗĪŒ‚ŖK© rhttp://www.ers.usda.gov/data/sdp/view.asp?f=crops/89004/åDŠÉźyłŗĪŒ‚ŖK© ąÉźyłŗĪŒ‚ŖK© thttp://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/agoutlook/aosupp.pdfõDŠÉźyłŗĪŒ‚ŖK© ąÉźyłŗĪŒ‚ŖK© „http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/agoutlook/oct2000/ao275e.pdfļDŠÉźyłŗĪŒ‚ŖK© ąÉźyłŗĪŒ‚ŖK© ~http://www.ers.usda.gov/briefing/FarmPolicy/ffc_insurrance.pdfĶDŠÉźyłŗĪŒ‚ŖK© ąÉźyłŗĪŒ‚ŖK© \http://www.ers.usda.gov/data/costsandreturns/ĶDŠÉźyłŗĪŒ‚ŖK© ąÉźyłŗĪŒ‚ŖK© \http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/sb974-2/ćDŠÉźyłŗĪŒ‚ŖK© ąÉźyłŗĪŒ‚ŖK© rhttp://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/aer801/aer801fm.pdfõDŠÉźyłŗĪŒ‚ŖK© ąÉźyłŗĪŒ‚ŖK© „http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/agoutlook/dec1999/ao267b.pdfćDŠÉźyłŗĪŒ‚ŖK© ąÉźyłŗĪŒ‚ŖK© rhttp://www.ers.usda.gov/briefing/FarmPolicy/1996malp.htmńDŠÉźyłŗĪŒ‚ŖK© ąÉźyłŗĪŒ‚ŖK© €http://www.ers.usda.gov/briefing/FarmPolicy/questions/index.htmķDŠÉźyłŗĪŒ‚ŖK© ąÉźyłŗĪŒ‚ŖK© |http://www.ers.usda.gov/briefing/FarmPolicy/cropInsurance.htmÕDŠÉźyłŗĪŒ‚ŖK© ąÉźyłŗĪŒ‚ŖK© dhttp://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/CWS-0601-01/ķDŠÉźyłŗĪŒ‚ŖK© ąÉźyłŗĪŒ‚ŖK© |http://www.ers.usda.gov/briefing/cotton/specialprovisions.htmåDŠÉźyłŗĪŒ‚ŖK© ąÉźyłŗĪŒ‚ŖK© thttp://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/tb1888/tb1888ref.pdfćDŠÉźyłŗĪŒ‚ŖK© ąÉźyłŗĪŒ‚ŖK© rhttp://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/aib729/aib729a3.pdf£DŠÉźyłŗĪŒ‚ŖK© ąÉźyłŗĪŒ‚ŖK© 2http://www.fsa.usda.gov/ÆDŠÉźyłŗĪŒ‚ŖK© ąÉźyłŗĪŒ‚ŖK© >http://www.fsa.usda.gov/pscad/éDŠÉźyłŗĪŒ‚ŖK© ąÉźyłŗĪŒ‚ŖK© xhttp://www.fsa.usda.gov/pas/publications/facts/pubfacts.htmłDŠÉźyłŗĪŒ‚ŖK© ąÉźyłŗĪŒ‚ŖK© ˆhttp://www.fsa.usda.gov/pas/publications/facts/html/upcotlock00.htmĖDŠÉźyłŗĪŒ‚ŖK© ąÉźyłŗĪŒ‚ŖK© Zhttp://www.fsa.usda.gov/dafp/psd/default.htmĻDŠÉźyłŗĪŒ‚ŖK© ąÉźyłŗĪŒ‚ŖK© ^http://www.fsa.usda.gov/pscad/answer82rnat.aspŪDŠÉźyłŗĪŒ‚ŖK© ąÉźyłŗĪŒ‚ŖK© jhttp://www.cbo.gov/showdoc.cfm?index=1944&sequence=0ŪDŠÉźyłŗĪŒ‚ŖK© ąÉźyłŗĪŒ‚ŖK© jhttp://www.fapri.missouri.edu/FAPRI_Publications.htm½DŠÉźyłŗĪŒ‚ŖK© ąÉźyłŗĪŒ‚ŖK© Lhttp://www.icac.org/icac/english.htmlżDŠÉźyłŗĪŒ‚ŖK© ąÉźyłŗĪŒ‚ŖK© Œhttp://www.icac.org/icac/CottonInfo/Publications/Reviews/english.htmlsDŠÉźyłŗĪŒ‚ŖK© ąÉźyłŗĪŒ‚ŖK© http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/NEWS/0,,contentMDK:20053593~menuPK:34463~pagePK:34370~piPK:34424~theSitePK:4607,00.htmlDŠÉźyłŗĪŒ‚ŖK© ąÉźyłŗĪŒ‚ŖK© ¢http://www.icac.org/icac/CottonInfo/Publications/Statistics/statsws/english.htmlsDŠÉźyłŗĪŒ‚ŖK© ąÉźyłŗĪŒ‚ŖK© http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/NEWS/0,,contentMDK:20053593~menuPK:34463~pagePK:34370~piPK:34424~theSitePK:4607,00.htmlm$$If–l!vh5Ö+5ÖE #v+#vE :V –l4öö+Ö5Ö+5ÖE 4Öaölf4q$$If–l!vh5Ö+5ÖE #v+#vE :V –l4”ˆ’öö+Ö5Ö+5ÖE 4Öaölf4m$$If–l!vh5Ö+5ÖE #v+#vE :V –l4öö+Ö5Ö+5ÖE 4Öaölf4p$$If–l!vh5Ö+5ÖE #v+#vE :V –löö5Ö+5ÖE /Ö ’4Öaölf$$If–l!vh5Ö+5ÖE #v+#vE :V –l”`’öö5Ö+5ÖE 4Öaölb$$If–l!vh5Ö+5ÖE #v+#vE :V –löö5Ö+5ÖE 4Öaöl8œJ@ń’J \’Normal$ ĘŠa$CJ_HmH sH tH N@"N Heading 1$ & F6¤š@& ĘŠ5;L@2L Heading 2$ & F6¤š@& ĘŠ:L@BL Heading 3$ & F6¤š@& ĘŠ5H@RH Heading 4$ & F6¤š@& ĘŠH@ņH Heading 5 & F6¤š@& ĘŠ66@6 Heading 6 ¤š@&6@6 Heading 7 ¤š@&DA@ņ’”D Default Paragraph FontVi@ó’³V  Table Normal :V ö4Ö4Ö laö (kō’Į(No List @B@ņ@ Body Text & F6¤š ĘhDT@D Block Text„ „ ¤š]„ ^„ >P@> Body Text 2  & F6¤š>Q@"> Body Text 3  & F6¤š>žO2> Body Text 4  & F6¤š>+B>  Endnote Text$a$CJf&@¢Qf %Footnote Reference,Ref,de nota al pieH*ō@bō ęFootnote Text,Footnote Text Char,fn Char,footnote text Char,Footnotes Char,Footnote ak Char,fn,footnote text,ft,fn cafc,Footnote ak,Footnotes,Footnotes Char Char,Footnote Text Char Char,fn Char Char,footnote text Char Char Char Ch „Š`„ŠCJ: : Index 1„Ż„#’^„Ż`„#’6!r6  Index Heading:0@’: List Bullet  & F;T6@¢T List Bullet 2  & F< Ęƒ„ „0ż^„ `„0żX8@²X List Bullet 4# & F> Ę¹ „p„0ż^„p`„0ż@1@Ā@ List Number & FD ĘhT:@ŅT List Number 2  & F@ Ęƒ„ „0ż^„ `„0ż<Z@ā< Plain Text CJOJQJ6J@ņ6 Subtitle $@&a$D,D Table of Authorities D#D Table of Figures ! ĘŠ€:>@": Title,t"$a$ 5;KH4žO24 Title 2#$a$>*4žOB4 Title 3$$a$6@žOR@ Title Country%$a$;6.6  TOA Heading&5ZZ TOC 10'$ Ęp# „Š„Š„0ż¤<¤<]„Š^„Š`„0ża$5;XX TOC 20($ Ęp# „Š„Š„0ż¤<¤<]„Š^„Š`„0ża$:\\ TOC 33)$ ĘŠp#@J„Š„Š„0ż¤<¤<]„Š^„Š`„0ża$5TT TOC 40*$ Ęp# „Š„Š„0ż¤<¤<]„Š^„Š`„0ża$XX TOC 50+$ Ęp# „Š„Š„0ż¤<¤<]„Š^„Š`„0ża$6PP TOC 6(,$ Ęp# „Š„Š¤<¤<]„Š^„Ša$CJPP TOC 7(-$ Ęp# „Š„L¤<¤<]„Š^„La$CJPP TOC 8(.$ Ęp# „Š„)¤<¤<]„Š^„)a$CJPP TOC 9(/$ Ęp# „Š„¤<¤<]„Š^„a$CJh$@h Envelope Address!0„@ „ü’„ō’„š&€+D¼/„“^„@ CJOJQJBžOB Quotation1„Š„Š¤š]„Š^„ŠPžO"P Quotation Double2„ „ ¤š]„ ^„ TžO2T Footnote Quotation3„Š„Š]„Š^„ŠCJ4 @B4 Footer 4 Ę”C#:@R: Header5$ Ę”C#a$4U@¢a4 \’ Hyperlink >*ph’.)@¢q. \’ Page Number›ü|prkŒ)„Osę#—šćh)„ š’’’’ 6š’’’’ 1RST]bc‘•–ÓŲŁŚåęēó1@ABLMNOPQefghi”•¹ŗ»²³ĆÄÅkl23žž’BC“ ” y z ` a ¹ ŗ  ±² PQ ¢£Éžy”Ęö&T…»Ū܁‚˜™ƒ„ģķŹĖ ”½!¾!Š"‹"ė#ģ#%%‚'ƒ' * *¬+­+--.-.....;.t.Æ.°.±.Z/[/ 1”1é1ź1j2k233·3ø3Ž66?7@7ƒ8„8Z9[9S:T:H;I;E<F<#=$=¾>æ>l?m?ź?ė?Ō@Õ@‰AŠANCOC˜D™DFF(G)GżGžGĀHĆH-J.JķJīJOLPL›MœMÕMNNėNObOŽO P‹PÅPAQ{QżQ,R²RS—SļSTœTUBU®UłU{VėVW¹W;XnXžX*Y¶YēY[Z™Z%[j[ī[$\¦\§\Ø\Ū\]]^]°]Ć]K^Į^Y_r_Ü_`Œ``Ä`?a@aˆabb+b‡b»bYc¦cōc=dPekefUf‚fƒf„fžfģfķf g2gtguggĀgÖh×hāhćhķhīhļhūhi i i i i iii)i*i+i5i6i7i8i9i:iNiOiPiQiRi}i~i±i²i³iojpj€jj‚j[m\m”n¢nßoąo²qrrœrrūrürqsrsEtFt§vØvŒww„y…y{ {„{…{||·~č€é€›‚œ‚0ƒ1ƒWƒ~ƒ³ƒ.„V„{„«„Ū„ …;…q……Į…Ā…f†g†}‰~‰h‹i‹oŒpŒ„…WŽXŽBCt‘u‘¢’£’0”1”3•4•Ē–Č–ī™ļ™Æœ°œ()ģķ<ž`ŸÓ ń”£„¤…¤©¤Ŗ¤«¤¬¤Ļ¤Š¤Ń¤õ¤ö¤÷¤„„„ „!„"„#„$„%„&„'„*„˜0€€°€˜"0€€˜"0€€˜"0€€0€€0€€˜0€€˜0€€©0€€ ©0€€ ™0€€ ©0€€ ©0€€ ™0€€ ©0€€ ©0€€ ™0€€ ˜0€€˜0€€Ą˜0€€˜0€€”0€€@”0€€@ ”0€€@ ‘0€€D © 0€€@ ©0€€@ ™0€€D © 0€€@ ©0€€@©0€€@ ™0€€D ©0€€@ ©0€€@ ™0€€D ©0€€@ ©0€€@ ™0€€D ©0€€@ ©50€€@ ™0€€D ˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜"0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€0˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€0˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€0˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€0˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€0˜0€€0˜0€€0˜0€€0˜0€€0˜0€€0˜0€€0˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€Ą˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€0˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€0˜0€€˜0€€0˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€0˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€0˜0€€˜0€€0˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€0˜0€€0˜0€€0˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€0˜0€€0˜0€€0˜0€€0˜0€€0˜0€€0˜0€€0˜0€€0˜0€€0˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€0˜0€€0˜0€€0˜0€€0˜0€€0˜0€€0˜0€€0˜0€€0˜0€€0˜0€€0˜0€€0˜0€€˜0€€0€€`˜0€€˜0€€ ˜0€€ ˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜@0€)˜0€€°€˜0€€˜0€€©0€€©0€€ ©0€€ ™0€€” © 0€€ ©0€€ ™0€€” © 0€€ ©0€€©0€€ ™0€€” ©0€€ ©0€€ ™0€€” ©0€€ ©0€€ ™0€€” ©0€€ ©50€€ ™0€€” ˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜"0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€0˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€0˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€0˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€0˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€0˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€0˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜@0€€ø˜@0€€ų€˜@0€€ų€˜@0€€˜@0€€ų€˜@0€€0¬~u ˜@50€€ų€˜@50€€˜@50€€˜@0€€€˜@50€€ų€˜@50€€˜@0€€˜@50€€ų€˜@50€€My00S˜@50€€ų€˜@50€€xMy00S˜@40€€ų€My00S˜@40€€ų€My00Säzh0 `My00S@A0 €My00č0‡u  1RST]bc‘•–ÓŲŁŚåęēó1@ABLMNOPQefghi”•¹ŗ»²³ĆÄÅkl23žž’BC“ ” y z ` a ¹ ŗ  ±² PQ ¢£Éžy”Ęö&T…»Ū܁‚˜™ƒ„ģķŹĖ ”½!¾!Š"‹"ė#ģ#%%‚'ƒ' * *¬+­+--.-....;.t.Æ.°.±.Z/[/ 1”1é1ź1j2k233·3ø3Ž66?7@7ƒ8„8Z9[9S:T:H;I;E<F<#=$=¾>æ>l?m?ź?ė?Ō@Õ@‰AŠANCOC˜D™DFF(G)GżGžGĀHĆH-J.JķJīJOLPL›MœMÕMNNėNObOŽO P‹PÅPAQ{QżQ,R²RS—SļSTœTUBU®UłU{VėVW¹W;XnXžX*Y¶YēY[Z™Z%[j[ī[$\¦\§\Ø\Ū\]]^]°]Ć]K^Į^Y_r_Ü_`Œ``Ä`?a@aˆabb+b‡b»bYc¦cōc=dPekefUf‚f„fžfģfķf g2gtguggĀgÖh×hāhćhķhīhļhūhi i i i i iii)i*i+i5i6i7i8i9i:iNiOiPiQiRi}i~i±i²i³iojpj€jj‚j[m\m”n¢nßoąo²qrrœrrūrürqsrsEtFt§vØvŒww„y…y{ {„{…{||·~č€é€›‚œ‚0ƒ1ƒWƒ~ƒ³ƒ.„V„{„«„Ū„ …;…q……Į…Ā…f†g†}‰~‰h‹i‹oŒpŒ„…WŽXŽBCt‘u‘¢’£’0”1”3•4•Ē–Č–ī™ļ™Æœ°œ()ģķ<ž`ŸÓ ń”£„¤…¤Ŗ¤«¤¬¤Ļ¤Š¤Ń¤*„\>0‰|00‰|00‰|00‰|00‰|00‰|00‰|00‰|00 ‰|0 0 ‰|00 ‰|00 ‰|0 0 ‰|00 ‰|00 ‰|00 ‰|00 ‰|00‰|00‰|00‰|00‰|00‰|00 ‰|00 ŒB0 ‰|00 ‰|00 €G7¤J@ ‰|00 ‰|00‰|00 @8 ‰|00 ‰|00 @0č  ‰|00 ‰|00@0 ‰|0 0 ‰|0 0 @0€ ‰|00€‰|00€‰|00€‰|00€‰|00€‰|00€‰|00€‰|00€‰|00€‰|00€‰|00€‰|00€‰|00€‰|00€‰|00€‰|00€‰|00€‰|00€‰|00€‰|00€˜@0€€š0€€Ą˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€0˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€0˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€0˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€š0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€0˜0€€0˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€0˜0€€0˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€š0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€0˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€0˜0€€0˜0€€0˜0€€0˜0€€0˜0€€0˜0€€0š0€€˜0€€0š0€€˜0€€0˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€0˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€0˜0€€‰|00€˜0€€Ą˜0€€˜0€€©0€€@©0€€@ ©0€€@ ™0€€D © 0€€@ ©0€€@ ™0€€D © 0€€@ ©0€€@©0€€@ ™0€€D ©0€€@ ©0€€@ ™0€€D ©0€€@ ©0€€@ ™0€€D ©0€€@ ©50€€@ ™0€€D ˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜"0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€š0€€0˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€0˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€ 0†ˆ“ė‹|00‹|00€‹|00€š@0€€‹|00€š@0€€ 0ŽĄvu š@50€€ų€š@50€€‹|00č 0k’@50€€ų€š@50€€‹|00č ōk 0Žō‚u 'LLLLLršœž ¢„ÕU=\&b¬g2o<¦­)­WeghjltvcŲ @ O ” a .5@?N{Yjc‡jćp q5qNqßw鈄•ÓØ%­)­XZ[\]^_`abcdfikmnopqrsuw(­YÕMśMNJN NéNO7O`OOŻOPĘP Q?Q|QĀQūQ-RvR°RSSS•SšS>T}TTŲTUCU~U¬UśU@VyVģV;W}WŗWX9XoX¼XüX+YvY“YčY'ZYZšZåZ#[k[²[ģ[%\k\¤\Ū\]]_]]¬]Ä] ^I^Ā^_W_s_­_Ś_`[`Š`Ä`a=aˆaŹa’a+b^b„b¼bcWc=dĶdNeleĢefĆgShŌh)„X’„X’„X’„X’„X’„X’„X’„X’„X’ŒX’„X’„X’„X’„X’„X’„X’„X’„X’„X’„X’„X’„X’„X’„X’„X’„X’„X’„X’„X’„X’„X’ŒX’„X’„"?FHdknŒ“–„!’•€!’•€!’•€!’•€’’E _Hlt19593912 _Hlt19593913 _Hlt19609631 _Hlt19592712 _Hlt19592713 _Hlt19592714 _Hlt19592715 _Hlt19592808 _Hlt19592809 _Hlt19592931 _Hlt19592932 _Hlt19592972 _Hlt19592973 _Hlt19593110 _Hlt19593111 _Hlt19593059 _Hlt19593060 _Hlt19593012 _Hlt19593013 _Hlt19593142 _Hlt19593143 _Hlt19593772 _Hlt19593773 _Hlt19592850 _Hlt19592851 _Hlt19593206 _Hlt19593207 _Hlt19593315 _Hlt19593316 _Hlt19593431 _Hlt19593432 _Hlt19592873 _Hlt19592878 _Hlt19593493 _Hlt19593494 _Hlt19593479 _Hlt19593480 _Hlt19593600 _Hlt19593638 _Hlt19593639 _Hlt19593692 _Hlt19593693 _Hlt19593830 _Hlt19593831 _Hlt19594068 _Hlt19594968 _Hlt19594969 _Hlt19594935 _Hlt19594936 _Hlt19594117 _Hlt19594118 _Hlt19595062 _Hlt19595063 _Hlt19595018 _Hlt19595019 _Hlt20277709 _Hlt20277710 _Hlt20277728 _Hlt20277729 _Hlt20277695 _Hlt20277696 _Hlt20277466 _Hlt20277467 _Hlt19596847 _Hlt19596848 _Hlt19595092 _Hlt19595426 _Hlt19595427 _Hlt20031335ÕMÕMæNÉNÉNŃNŃNŲNŲNLOLOPP‹P‹PQQĢQĢQļTļTžUžUBVBVRVRVKWKW%X%XÅXČXŒYŒY¦Y¦Y4ZśZśZŠ[Š[€\€\–]°]°]^^=_=_Y_Y_Ą_Ą_Ü_Ü_``i`i`l`l`p`p`s`źaźaėd*„@@@@@@@@@ @ @ @ @@@ @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ @!@"@#@$@%@&@'@(@)@*@+@,@/@0@-@.@1@2@5@6@3@4@>@?@@@A@7@8@9@:@;@<@=@B@C@D@NNĄNŹNŹNŅNŅNŁNŁNMOMOPPQQ@Q@QĶQĶQšTšTŸUŸUCVCVSVSVLWLW&X&XĘXÉXYY§Y§Y5ZūZūZŃ[Ń[\\—]^^J^J^>_>_Į_Į_Ū_Ū_j`j`m`m`q`q`t`‹`‹`‹`‹`ėaėaģd*„’’³O¬=„9L P¬=ÜŹQ¬=t€T R¬=ĢV S¬=Ü)ŹT¬=lÉU¬=ģŹV¬=l#ĢW¬=ÜžX¬=¬ģM Y¬=“ĻZ¬= O [¬=œŻĖ\¬=ģ=Z ]¬=ōĻ^¬=4€Ļ_¬=“Ļ`¬=\ŻĖa¬=„™T b¬=ŻĖc¬=ÜÜĖd¬=œÜĖe¬=“€Ļf¬=\ÜĖg¬=ō€Ļh¬=ÜĖi¬=ÜŪĖj¬=œŪĖk¬=\ŪĖl¬=t€Ļm¬=\ŽĖn¬=ÜŽĖo¬=œŽĖp¬=ßĖq¬=ŪĖr¬=L s¬=ÜŚĖt¬=œŁĖu¬=\ŁĖv¬=œŚĖw¬=ÜŁĖx¬=\ŚĖy¬=ŚĖz¬=ŁĖ{¬=ÜŲĖ|¬=ŒV }¬=ŌT ~¬=Œˆd ¬=T €¬=”GŹ¬= O ‚¬=|”Y ƒ¬=,įb „¬=÷h …¬=ō×` †¬=l£Ź‡¬=\õL ˆ¬=DūM ‰¬=|ŹR Š¬= K ‹¬=<K Œ¬=ŌœĻ¬=œŹŽ¬=\ Ź¬=äeS ¬=ģ{‘¬=LöR ’¬= éK “¬=¼Ėb ”¬=L”R •¬=\»Z –¬=trL —¬=ÄfT ˜¬=¬$ ™¬=D`N š¬=4cĢ›¬=dR œ¬=ĢåW ¬=,#Ģž¬=üR Ÿ¬=,DX  ¬=ttX ”¬=œsX ¢¬=ÄrX £¬=ģqX ¤¬=+>Ż>Ż>??ŖAŖA B BįEįE/G/GpMpM~M8P8PĄUĄU®^papa~a-f-f f fiŖiŖi×i>lflflŠlŽqŽq`r`rærær5s5s;{;{ž‚ž‚Ē…Ē…é‰é‰ęŒęŒņŒņŒĶĶļļ–˜–˜™™­™­™pœpœ±œ±œ**Ś¶žŃžßžßžóžóž1 1 ¢ ¾ w”w”¹”¹”k¢†¢”¢”¢Ø¢Ø¢ā£ā£S¤o¤*„      !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^`_abcdefhgijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~€‚ƒ„…†‡ˆ‰Š‹ŒŽ‘’“”•–—˜™š›œžŸ ”¢£¤„¦§Ø©Ŗ«¬­®Æ°±²ŅŅ?øøšDDbbĆĆ22Ų Ų €€ććžžččjj{"{"+&+&™&™&G'G'×)×)ö+ö+i,i,„-„---É-É-..®.®.ŗ.ŗ.ī.˜/˜/00v0v0O1O1Ī1Ī1ī1ī1F2F277…9…9÷9÷9r=r=Ē=Ē=->->ć>ć>??·A·ABBćEćE1G1GzM†M†M:P:PĀUĀU“^za†a†a3f3f¢f¢f(i°i°ięiLlslslßląqąqbrbrĮrĮr7s7s={={ ƒ ƒÉ…É…ė‰ė‰ģŒģŒ’Œ’ŒŚŚüü˜˜˜˜™™³™³™vœvœ·œ·œ00źĆžŻžåžåžŸŸ3 3 ° Ļ }”}”»”»”x¢’¢š¢š¢µ¢µ¢ä£ä£a¤€¤*„  !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^`_abcdefhgijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~€‚ƒ„…†‡ˆ‰Š‹ŒŽ‘’“”•–—˜™š›œžŸ ”¢£¤„¦§Ø©Ŗ«¬­®Æ°±²=S*€urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags €PlaceType€=R*€urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags €PlaceName€8€*€urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags€City€8Æ*€urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags€date€B²*€urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags€country-region€V³*€urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags€place€http://www.5iantlavalamp.com/ €1€10€17€19€2€2000€2001€2002€2003€27€3€30€31€6€7€8€9€Day€Month€Year³²³²Æ ³²Æ ³²³²³²³²³²³²³²³²³²³²³²³²³²³²³²³²³²³²³²³²³²³€³²³²Æ ³²³²³²³²³²³²³²³²³²³²³²³²³²³²³²³²³²³²³²³SR³²³²³³SR³²³²Æ³²Æ Æ ³²Æ³²³²³²³²³²³²³²³²³²³²³²³²³²³²³²³²³²³²ÆÆÆ ³²³²³²ÆÆ ³²³²ÆÆ ³²³²³²ÆÆ ­°¬Æcf§¬ @DC H j n gj¦©ŗ½ļņ’•·ŗ®µVYCJäē²µsvŖ­’®!±!É#Ģ#ę$é$&&Õ&Ų&q't'A(E(h)k)ś)ż)'***C,G,ü01›DŸD²]µ]Š^^jjmjNkQkllŹmĶm=n@nÖnŁn oo©t®tu uBuFuWv\vŠzŌzĖ{Ī{ | |HƒKƒnƒqƒ¤ƒ§ƒĢƒĻƒG„J„l„o„“†š†;‡>‡(ˆ/ˆÉˆĢˆ—ŠšŠX‹[‹Œ ŒPŒSŒdgHŽKŽ36””•• –– ˜˜Ž˜į˜Ż™ą™ōšųšœ œ œ£œ#&ķŸŸĘ¢Ź¢…¤'„*„ŹĢČŹ]_ó&õ&/.3.;.=.t.w.>fBf€…‚…­†Æ†BˆDˆżŪāč’÷’ü˜ž˜ķn””…¤'„*„3333333333333333ģ…¤¤Ø¤Ä¤Ī¤é¤ō¤õ¤÷¤„„„'„*„ķ…¤'„*„|’’’ d·’’’’’’’’’}’’’ (Ģ ’’’’’’’’’~’’’Ž4’’’’’’’’’’’’ętlv’’’’’’’’€’’’<÷”Š’’’’’’’’’’’’ö@2r’’’’’’’’‚’’’H N\’’’’’’’’’ƒ’’’Ä Ā>’’’’’’’’ˆ’’’āS(ø’’’’’’’’’‰’’’<²4±’’’’’’’’’47Ć vč&`’’’’’’’’’'zŽd˜Žv’’’’’’’’’]<Ö ¢Ž >ž%š9pĪ³&'+œŹc’’’’’’’’’ŲÉ2֗čÄ„Ō„˜žĘŌ^„Ō`„˜ž.„¹„˜žĘ¹^„¹`„˜ž.„ž„˜žĘž^„ž`„˜ž.„ƒ„˜žĘƒ^„ƒ`„˜ž. „Ō„˜žĘŌ^„Ō`„˜žOJQJo(·š „¹„˜žĘ¹^„¹`„˜žOJQJo(·š „ž„˜žĘž^„ž`„˜žOJQJo(·š „ƒ„˜žĘƒ^„ƒ`„˜žOJQJo(·š„h„˜žĘh^„h`„˜ž. „h„˜žĘh^„h`„˜žOJQJo(·š„Š„0żĘŠ^„Š`„0ż.„Š„0żĘŠ^„Š`„0ż.„Š„0żĘŠ^„Š`„0ż.„Š„0żĘŠ^„Š`„0ż()„„Ęh^„`„.„ „0żĘ ^„ `„0ż()„p„0żĘp^„p`„0ż()„ „Ę^„ `„()„p„Ę@ ^„p`„()„„Ęh^„`„o(„ „0żĘ ^„ `„0żo(()„p„0żĘp^„p`„0żo(()’„p„0żĘp^„p`„0żo(-„Š„0żĘŠ^„Š`„0żo(()„ „0żĘ ^„ `„0żo(()’„ „0żĘ ^„ `„0żo(-„p„0żĘp^„p`„0żo(()„@ „0żĘ@ ^„@ `„0żo(()„„Ęh^„`„o(. „Š„0żĘŠ^„Š`„0żOJQJo(-š„„ĘŠ^„`„.„„ĘŠ^„`„.„„ĘŠ^„`„.„„ĘŠ^„`„()„„ĘŠ^„`„()„„ĘŠ^„`„.„ „0żĘ ^„ `„0ż()„ „0żĘ ^„ `„0ż()’„7„iżĘ7^„7`„iż-„Š„0żĘŠ^„Š`„0ż.„Š„0żĘŠ^„Š`„0ż.„Š„0żĘŠ^„Š`„0ż.„Š„0żĘŠ^„Š`„0ż()„Š„0żĘŠ^„Š`„0ż()„„Ęh^„`„.„ „0żĘ ^„ `„0ż()„p„0żĘp^„p`„0ż()’„p„0żĘp^„p`„0ż-IŲÉ2ŲÉ2ŲÉ2ŲÉ247Ć ŲÉ2ŲÉ2ŲÉ2ŲÉ2ŲÉ2‰’’’ >ž%ƒ’’’ƒ’’’‚’’’‚’’’’’’’’’€’’’€’’’ˆ’’’’’’’’’~’’’~’’’}’’’}’’’|’’’|’’’ŲÉ2ŲÉ2ŲÉ2ŲÉ247Ć ŲÉ2ŲÉ2ŲÉ2ŲÉ2ŲÉ2 >ž%ƒ’’’‚’’’’’’€’’’’’’~’’’}’’’|’’’ŲÉ2ŲÉ2ŲÉ2ŲÉ247Ć ŲÉ2ŲÉ2ŲÉ2ŲÉ2ŲÉ2 >ž%ƒ’’’‚’’’’’’¶Ä’’’’’’“Ź’’’°Ø’’’“„’’’±Õ<Ö'zŽ³&'+³&'+³&'+³&'+’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’ å0ģ^ ‚N Ų™;l\’gd““–T]bc‘•–ÓŲŁē@ABLMNOPQef×hāhļhi i i i i ii)i*i+i5i6i7i8i9i:iNiOiķÓ „¤…¤Ń¤'„*„žž–žžžžž–’@€¼Ž{ )„@’’Unknown’’’’’’’’’’’’G‡z €’Times New Roman5€Symbol3& ‡z €’Arial?5 ‡z €’Courier New#qˆšŠhŲ:‰FŲ:‰F’[†P’[†P!š  n“€€24d“KOæ3ƒqšßßH š’?ä’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’™’’ANNEX NaspinallMorisL           ž’ą…ŸņłOh«‘+'³Ł0p˜Ø“ČŌč ų  , 8 DPX`häANNEX NNNE aspinall spi Normal.dotMoris.d2riMicrosoft Word 10.0@FĆ#@@ømh¼”Ä@ømh¼”Ä’[†ž’ÕĶ՜.“—+,ł®DÕĶ՜.“—+,ł®h$ pxœ°øĄČ ŠŲąč š äPanel Report Annex(draft)o OMC - °ÄĆÅĮłŗĻ²Ź¹ŁĶų׏ĮĻrtPā ANNEX N TitleÄ XGWckŸ · _PID_HLINKSSymbol1AnnNum_AdHocReviewCycleID_EmailSubject _AuthorEmail_AuthorEmailDisplayName _ReviewingToolsShownOnceäA ĘGL`http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/NEWS/0,,contentMDK:20053593~menuPK:34463~pagePK:34370~piPK:34424~theSitePK:4607,00.htmlDF]Qhttp://www.icac.org/icac/CottonInfo/Publications/Statistics/statsws/english.htmlGLZhttp://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/NEWS/0,,contentMDK:20053593~menuPK:34463~pagePK:34370~piPK:34424~theSitePK:4607,00.htmlFWFhttp://www.icac.org/icac/CottonInfo/Publications/Reviews/english.htmlTVT&http://www.icac.org/icac/english.htmlCiQ5http://www.fapri.missouri.edu/FAPRI_Publications.htmY^N5http://www.cbo.gov/showdoc.cfm?index=1944&sequence=0x<K/http://www.fsa.usda.gov/pscad/answer82rnat.aspMPH-http://www.fsa.usda.gov/dafp/psd/default.htm#)EDhttp://www.fsa.usda.gov/pas/publications/facts/html/upcotlock00.htmn$B<http://www.fsa.usda.gov/pas/publications/facts/pubfacts.htmyn?http://www.fsa.usda.gov/pscad/S<http://www.fsa.usda.gov/@ 99http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/aib729/aib729a3.pdfFO6:http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/tb1888/tb1888ref.pdfFU3>http://www.ers.usda.gov/briefing/cotton/specialprovisions.htmP\02http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/CWS-0601-01/W^->http://www.ers.usda.gov/briefing/FarmPolicy/cropInsurance.htm1`*@http://www.ers.usda.gov/briefing/FarmPolicy/questions/index.htm'9http://www.ers.usda.gov/briefing/FarmPolicy/1996malp.htm $Bhttp://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/agoutlook/dec1999/ao267b.pdf^K!9http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/aer801/aer801fm.pdfE.http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/sb974-2/PH.http://www.ers.usda.gov/data/costsandreturns/uR?http://www.ers.usda.gov/briefing/FarmPolicy/ffc_insurrance.pdfBhttp://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/agoutlook/oct2000/ao275e.pdf:http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/agoutlook/aosupp.pdfQ9http://www.ers.usda.gov/data/sdp/view.asp?f=crops/89004/F 6http://www.ers.usda.gov/briefing/cotton/Data/data.htm _ Ahttp://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/so/view.asp?f=field/cws-bb/V )http://www.ers.usda.gov/briefing/cotton/VcGhttp://www.ers.usda.gov/Features/farmbill/titles/titleIcommodities.htmcBhttp://www.ers.usda.gov/WT/DSwi1/DÆ’Bæ 5345.4 egToDaniele.Bardin@wto.orgeBardin, Danieleard  !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxž’’’z{|}~€‚ƒ„…†‡ˆ‰Š‹ž’’’Ž‘’“”•–—˜™š›œžŸ ”¢£¤„¦§Ø©Ŗ«¬­®Æ°±²³“µ¶·ø¹ŗ»¼½¾æĄĮĀĆÄÅĘĒČÉŹĖĢĶĪĻŠŃŅÓŌÕÖ×ŲŁŚŪÜŻŽßąįāćäåęēčéźėģķīž’’’šńņóōõöž’’’ųłśūüżž’ž’’’ż’’’ż’’’ż’’’ž’’’ž’’’ž’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’Root Entry’’’’’’’’ ĄF°<Øq¼”Ä €Data ’’’’’’’’’’’’yö$1Table’’’’ŒHÅWordDocument’’’’ešSummaryInformation(’’’’’’’’’’’’ļDocumentSummaryInformation8’’’’’’’’÷,CompObj’’’’’’’’’’’’j’’’’’’’’’’’’ž’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’ž’ ’’’’ ĄFMicrosoft Word Document MSWordDocWord.Document.8ō9²q