ࡱ> Y XbjbjWW %==SD]  888LLLL8tLSzz(DSFSFSFSFSFSFS$qTeVLjS8jSP*j88DSLLDSZ FO 8DS D FPLLpRbDecember 2002 Original: ENGLISH Forum on Public Procurement Reform Dar es Salaam 14-17 January, 2003 Regional Procurement Reform Initiative by Stephen Karangizi Director-Legal Affairs, COMESA Secretariat 02-(mk) I. INTRODUCTION 1. Background The Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa (COMESA) aims to fully integrate the countries of Eastern and Southern Africa into an economic union through trade and investment. COMESA attained a Free Trade Area on 31 October 2000 after 17 years of a trade liberalisation programme starting under the Preferential Trade Areas for Eastern and Southern African States (PTA) which was established in 1982. The immediate objective of COMESA is to move to a Customs by the year 2004. As the region gets more integrated and trade more liberalised, the need to ensure fair and open trade will be greater. In order to enhance competition and transparency in both private and public procurement arrangements, it is essential that regulations and procurement procedures be harmonised across the Free Trade Area and this is the aim of the regional approach to public procurement under COMESA. One of the most important principles to regional integration is to maintain an outward oriented approach recognising that most of the Member States of COMESA also belong to the World Trade Organisation. Rationale for the Project The proposal to reform Public Procurement by COMESA is based on the Treaty objectives as set out in the COMESA Treaty in Article 3(c) which provides that one of the aims and objectives of COMESA is to co-operate in the creation of an enabling environment for investment; (b) Article 4 in paragraph 6 subparagraph (b) which provides for the harmonisation or approximation of the laws of the member states for the proper functioning of the Common Market; and (c) Article 55 under which the member states have agreed that any practice which negates the objective of free and liberalised trade shall be prohibited. Under this provision the member States have agreed to have a comprehensive Regional Competition policy. The idea for the project also originated from requests by member states that the public procurement practices in some of the member states was a deterrent to increased trade in the COMESA region. COMESA therefore recognised the need to embark on the project on Public Procurement Reform as part of a comprehensive development to develop a Regional Competition policy. Specifically, the COMESA Public Procurement project which started in 2001, aims to lay the groundwork for ensuring accountability and transparency, combating corruption, and creating an enabling legal infrastructure in public procurement in the COMESA countries. The presence of strong institutional support at the top levels of government for administering and monitoring the public procurement process is an essential factor for promoting integrity and proper application of procurement law. This leads to increased efficiency and professional performance in procurement operations. II. ORIGINS OF THE PROJECT 2. Support by the COMESA Council of Ministers and African Development Bank The COMESA Council of Ministers recognised in 1998 that there was need to have uniform and harmonised procurement rules, and the institutional capacity to develop coherent policies to enhance trade through closer coordination of public procurement activities of member States. The Council recognised the importance of harmonising procurement policies in line with the process of effective liberalisation of trade, and recommended that the COMESA Secretariat should mobilise funding to embark on the proposed study to identify existing procurement rules and their weaknesses in the member States. On the direction of Council, the Secretariat undertook consultations with the African Development Bank who agreed in 2001 to fund the COMESA Public Procurement Reform Project. The project was funded by the African Development Bank through an African Development Fund grant with some contribution from COMESA. The African Development Bank, the World Bank, UNDP and the International Trade Centre (ITC) jointly sponsored the Conference on Public Procurement Reform in Africa in Abidjan in 1998. Many of the COMESA countries were represented at the conference. The COMESA Secretariat was fortunate to assist the promoters of the Abidjan Conference in collecting and collating data on the status of public procurement reform in Africa. Participants at the conference reviewed the various aspects of public procurement reform and reached consensus on public procurement reform strategy for Africa. This consensus document emphasizes the need for commitment to the reform process at the highest levels of government in order to support legal, organisational and institutional changes. 3. Project Objectives The COMESA project on Public Procurement seeks to achieve the following objectives: Strengthen the capacity of member States in public procurement; Enhance competition in the procurement of goods and services within the COMESA free trade area; Harmonisation of public procurement rules and regulations in COMESA; Encourage more awareness of procurement opportunities; Improve national procurement systems through transparent rules, regulations and procedures; Promote efficient and optimal utilisation of government resources; Enhance intra-COMESA trade; and Ensure sustainability of goods practices in public procurement. 4. Target Beneficiaries The project will benefit the COMESA member States by improving their institutional capacity to implement public procurement reforms. It will also strengthen the capacity of the COMESA Secretariat to assist the COMESA member countries in the implementation of public procurement reforms. Specifically, it will support COMESA member governments to: Promote regional harmonisation of public procurement regulations and better access to public procurement markets by enterprises in member States as a means to increase intra-regional trade; Improve national public procurement systems through more transparent regulations and procedures, increased professionalism and reduced opportunities for corruption; and Enhance the capacities of recipient country public procurement systems to take on responsibility (including full accountability) for aid-financed procurement and to carry out more cost-effective procurement related to infrastructure projects. The project will also lead to a wider development objective of promoting better governance under the principles of economy, efficiency, non-discrimination, transparency and accountability in public procurement, and enhance intra-regional trade among COMESA member States. 5. Project Scope and Components The project will have the following components: 5.2 Phase I: Baseline Data Collection, Analysis, Model Building and Validation Components 1: A Study of the Existing Public Procurement, Laws, Institutions and Practices The study and its validation which took place from June to September 2002 and comprised of the following activities: a. A survey of member States to identify the legal framework, policies, institutions and practices on public procurement. It will highlight in full details, the following elements of public procurement: Laws, rules, policies and regulations Procurement practices Implications of procurement practices for: good governance; fiscal management; intra-regional trade; Assessment of existing human resource capacities and deficiencies Identification of discriminatory and distortionary practices b. Identification of international Models on Best Practices. This involves a study to identify international models of laws, policies and practices found to be successful under the principles of good governance which COMESA may incorporate in its model. c. Synthesis of the findings and a broad outline of the elements of the model. Component 2: Forum of Stakeholders The First Forum of the Stakeholders (held in Nairobi, Kenya from 3 to 6 December 2002) was organised for all the stakeholders to analyse, discuss and develop the main elements of the COMESA public procurement model. The Forum is based on the output in (c) above. The discussions and recommendations of the First Forum covered following: an outline of the elements of the required harmonisation; objectives of the regional public procurement reform; institutional capacity to carry out the required reforms; and establishment of success criteria; identification of the means for COMESA Secretariat to sustain public procurement reform in COMESA; basic elements of standard procurement documents; training requirements in member States; and development of electronic procurement information at the COMESA Secretariat. Component 3: Development of a COMESA Model Under this component, which is currently ongoing a COMESA model of appropriate laws, rules, regulations, procedures and practices which will be rooted on the principles of good governance will be developed for consideration by the Second Stakeholder Forum and subsequent adoption by the COMESA policy organs. The envisaged key activities are to: Review the current organisational models supporting public procurement including an efficient and sustainable training approach to support public procurement officers; Develop a blueprint for a central public procurement policy office with responsibility, inter-alia, for policies on the efficient and sustainable training of public procurement officers; Develop a regulatory and statutory framework for public procurement using relevant international model laws (e.g. UNCITRAL) which ensures that added value is provided to budget resources and which is compatible with international obligations (e.g. World Bank loan requirements); Draft standard bidding documents; Enhance the capability of COMESA Website to publicise national procurement opportunities of member States; and Develop for member States a model system of comparable statistics on items bought and degree of competition. The model will essentially contain the elements already determined by the stakeholders during their first workshop. Consideration of the model will now take place at the Second Stakeholder workshop expected to take place at Addis Ababa from 10th to 12th February, 2003. 5.3 Phase II: Operationalisation of the Model Component 4: Legislation to support Public Procurement Reform Member States are expected to start the process of making legislation to back the COMESA public procurement reform using the model. For some countries, this will form part of their legislation on national public procurement reforms, while for some it will be an independent effort, depending on the stage of each country in the public procurement reform. The project will provide legal support to needing member States to implement the necessary legislative reforms Component 5: Institutional Reforms and Capacity Building in Public Procurement Agencies Member States will embark on institutional reforms and capacity building for their national public procurement agencies to remedy the deficiencies that would have been identified in Phase 1 and to effectively implement the COMESA model. Some member States would have made reasonable progress on this during the phase two of this project while some will be implementing it as part of their programme on good governance. However, the capacity that will be built at the COMESA Secretariat which, through this project, will provide guidance, training and technical support to the member States in the implementation of the reforms. Component 6: Training of Procurement Agency Staff Although all the member States would not have started or completed the reform of their public procurement agencies, it will be useful to start the process of capacity building for effective implementation of the COMESA model by conducting training programmes for the staff of the national procurement agencies. Component 7: Creating Capacity for Collection and Publication (dissemination) of procurement information An IT based procurement information system will be developed, installed and operated at the COMESA Secretariat. The system will be anchored on the COMESA Website and will publicise national procurement newsletter. It will also contain full information on market access, procurement advertisements, and standard bidding documents (as developed in phase 1). The system will compile information on procurement activities in member States and the degree of information applied. Component 8: Creating Capacities to Sustain Good Procurement Practices a. At the COMESA Secretariat The COMESA Secretariat will remain a focal point for monitoring activities and ensuring continued implementation of the required practices by all its member countries. At the Regional level (network) Constant interaction and sharing of experiences by member countries on the implementation of the COMESA model will help to ensure long run sustenance of the good practices. To this end, the Secretariat will encourage the heads of national procurement officers to establish a network for cooperation. The meeting of the stakeholder during Phase 1 of the project will be used to initiate the process for the formation of the technical committee. The Secretariat will submit to the Council, the request for the approval of the committee and the implementation of this action. 6. Results of the Baseline study by COMESA As indicated above the Project started with a baseline study carried out by the consultancy firm on the status of public procurement reform in all the member states of COMESA. The findings of the study were as follows: A number of COMESA member states have embarked on procurement reform initiatives. Those efforts have consisted of law reform, as well as organisation and institutional reform and developments. Measures that have been adopted, or are being prepared, to one extent or another, have included: The adoption of new procurement rules, in the form of new or revised procurement regulations, The enactment of a statute (a Public Procurement Law or a Public Procurement Act, setting forth fundamental rules and procedures of the procurement contract award process, and other issues related to the legal and institutional framework for public procurement; more States are taking or contemplating the watershed step of transforming a legal framework based merely on regulation to one based on a procurement law; Reform and development of institutional and organisational arrangements for public procurement. Such reforms may consist of : the establishing, for the first time, of a centralised policy and monitoring function for public procurement; that body, which should not be operationally involved in procurement proceedings, may also conduct other activities to develop procurement capacity, promote proper implementation, and enforce applicable rules, increasing decentralisation of procurement authority at the central Government level, as well as the regional and local levels; revision of monetary-value limits on delegation of procurement authority, and approval procedures that may apply to contracts awarded value authority limits; Possible review of supply and material management arrangements; Measure to promote professionalism in public procurement (e.g., establishment or enhancement of supply officer posts in the civil service roster, and of a related career development path, establishment of procurement units to act as a professional procurement secretariats within procuring entities, providing support and continuity to complement the work of procurement committees in periodic sessions); Despite positive development such as the above being pursued at one or the other stage in some COMESA member States, problems persist and reform challenges remain in national procurement systems across the COMESA region. Phenomena appearing in many procurement systems, with limited exception, include: Lack of a sufficiently strong, clear and modern legal framework for public procurement, typically lack of a statute as the main instrument, and de facto or de jure gaps in the legal framework; weakness in other areas of legislation, ancillary to public procurement (e.g., legal framework for arbitration, electronic commerce, and others); Fragmentation in the legal framework applicable to public procurement, when there is a multiplicity of legal instruments applicable to public procurement, some of which may be overlapping and inconsistent, with an unclear hierarchy; Lack of adequate access to the legal instruments applicable to public procurement, negatively affecting the familiarity of public officials and the private sector with applicable rules; Various deficiencies and idiosyncrasies in practices and procedures, some of which would have an impact on the implementation of a regional public procurement market under the COMESA Free Trade Area. Those include, for example: Poor procurement planning; Ease of access to less competitive methods of procurement, and unclear definition of conditions for use of procurement methods; in some cases an inadequate range of procurement methods are available to procuring entities (e.g., lack of a request for quotation method, or a method specifically designed for procurement of consultants services; Insufficient circulation of information concerning bidding opportunities; Short time-periods for preparation and submission (which impact on domestic bidders, and would impact even more heavily on foreign bidders from other COMESA States); Inadequacies in bidding documents, such as lack of standard bidding documents, and inadequacies or restrictiveness in technical descriptions; Weaknesses in bid evaluation practices (e.g., poor definition, disclosure and application of bid evaluation criteria, resort to non-transparent negotiation procedures; Broad preference provisions in favour of domestic bidders; Weaknesses in contract administration practices (e.g., unreliability of cash allocations for items authorised in the budget;, contributing to delays in payment) Inadequate recording and archiving requirements with respect to procurement proceedings, and lack of debriefing of unsuccessful bidders. Inefficiencies and inadequacies in institutional and organisation arrangements and resources, for example: inadequate staffing and skill level of personnel assigned to procurement functions, contributing to poor implementation, higher level officialdom formally or informally has a role in award making decision for an excessive number of contracts (need to adjust authority limits and let procurement authority devolve to a greater extent than may presently be the case); poor enforcement of proper implementation of procurement rules (e.g., inadequate or non-existent bid protest mechanisms), inadequate enforcement accountability measures to the extent such rules and measures may be codified (standards of conduct, anti-corruption and conflict of interest provisions); difficulties in access of bidders to bid, performance and other securities that may be called for as conditions of participation in the procurement process. 7. Phase III: Follow up actions a. Assessment of how well the model is working/updating The Secretariat will monitor the progress in the implementation of the model in the member countries. They will visit at least five member States to assess the performance of the model. After the implementation stage of the project such visits will be routinely performed by the Secretariat. b. Regular meeting of procurement experts The Secretariat will encourage periodic meeting of the technical committee of procurement officers, which will serve as the forum to review performance and resolve problems being encountered. c. Retraining This will be a reoccurring activity for the staff of the implementation agencies as well as the Secretariat staff implementing the model. 8. Institutional Arrangement for Implementation The institutional arrangement for implementation of the project is based on a two-tier arrangement. The top tier of the project institutional arrangement consists of the Project Steering Committee, which consists of the Secretariat staff and three representatives of the member States from Ethiopia, Mauritius and Zambia. The second tier of the project is the project team at the COMESA Secretariat that manages the project on a continuous basis as well as a Consultancy Firm (the International Law Institute) that was appointed to provide the Consultancy services following an international tendering process. 9. Conclusion The COMESA Public Procurement Reform Project illustrates that Public Procurement Reform can be addressed through Regional approaches as most of the member states face the same challenges of development. The major challenge relates to the need to maximise the utilisation of scarce resources to address the developmental needs. References 1. COMESA Project Document on the Public Procurement Reform Project - 2000 2. Interim Report Baseline Diagonistic Study of Public Procurement Practices in COMESA by the International Law Institute for the COMESA Secretariat ( November, 2002).  The Member States are: Angola, Burundi; Comoros; Democratic Republic of Congo; Djibouti; Egypt; Eritrea; Ethiopia; Kenya; Madagascar; Malawi; Mauritius; Namibia; Rwanda; Seychelles; Sudan; Swaziland; Uganda; Zambia; Zimbabwe COM/PPRP/SHF/3 Page  PAGE 12 COM/PPRP/SHF/3 Page  PAGE 11 #kNO\ v  $q/-. u!!I#m#x$&&& (4((+,,,,,,,0-1-.//_/`0a011 2 2C3D33555565mH H*mH 56CJOJQJmH nH56mH j0JCJOJQJU CJOJQJ5CJOJQJ5M!"#$HIWklmno$$$!"#$HIWklmno\ ] w x F G J K  /089ij  |}cdA\ ] w x $ & F$$$$ F G J K  $%pq  $H$0$00$$$0$ $%pq  ./%&klDEef¼zwolifa45MN      P  Q    /  0 p q[\% ./%&klDE$0$ & F0 h$$D$EƀlEefz{-.$0$ & F0 h$$$0$ & F0 hz{-. ! !9!:!K!^!t!u!!!!!""G#}zurolifc;<#  #   # '(jkGHhiyzm  n    & ! !9!:!K!^!t!u!!!!!""G#H#I#l#$ & F#$0$0$0$G#H#I#l#m#x$y$$$$$5%6%%%%%.&/&[&\&&&&& ( (3(4((())***ƾ|yqnfc[       v w JK      \  ]     0 1{|#l#m#x$y$$$$$5%6%%%%%.&/&[&\&&&&& ( (3($0$0$ & F0 h$$$03(4((())****C+D+++,,,,,0-1-//^/_/$$0$ & F0 h$0  & F0 h$**C+D+++,,,,,0-1-//^/_/1111 2 2C3D333555555666699}vqlg ;. <KL*+  f  g  &_/1111 2 2C3D333555555666699,9-9 : :$ & F.$$0$6669,9 :.;A!CCCCCOOOOP7Q8Q;QcQ$R%R(R4RRRR2TYUrUUUVVWWXXXXXXXXXXXXXXǿǿ0JmH0J j0JU j0JUnH56CJOJQJ5CJOJQJ6CJOJQJmH 5mH  CJOJQJ39,9-9 : :.;/;;;4=5====>>w?x?@@W@X@AA!C"CCCwDxDyDbEcEFF¼|tqnfc[Xu)  v_)  `a)   ) (  (  `(  a(   "( #$'  I'  J ' " :.;/;;;4=5====>>w?x?@@W@X@AA!C"CCCwD$ & F)$$ & F( & F'$h$ & F'$wDxDyDbEcEFFGG G!GyHzHHHkIlIIIJJJJKK L L$$ & F*$$ & F)$hFGG G!GyHzHHHkIlIIIJJJJKK L LwLxLLLMMOOOOOOOPP7Q8QbQ¿yvnkcaa,  ,  ,   `, a + V*  W*  4*  5*  l*  m*  ^*  _*   * )  & LwLxLLLMMOOOOOOOPP7Q8QbQcQ$R%R3R4RRRR$$$ & F,$$ & F+bQcQ$R%R3R4RRRRR2T3TUUWUXUYUZU[U\U]UrUsUVVVVWWWXXXXXXXXXXXXX )RR2T3TUUWUXUYUZU[U\U]UrUsUVVVVWWWXXXXXXX$$$$XXXXXXX$# 0&P . A!"#$% [$@$NormalmH D@D Heading 1 $$@&5CJOJQJnH J@J Heading 2 $$@&56CJOJQJmH nH <A@<Default Paragraph Font2B@2 Body Text CJOJQJ8&@8Footnote ReferenceH*LC@LBody Text Indent$5CJOJQJnH HQ@"H Body Text 3$56CJOJQJmH nH XR@2XBody Text Indent 2 $0CJOJQJmH nH XS@BXBody Text Indent 3 $0CJOJQJmH nH 6@R6 Footnote TextmH nH ,@b,Header  !&)@q& Page Number, ,Footer  !:P@: Body Text 2$ CJOJQJNTTT"CCCCCF6X-< El#3(_/ :wD LRXX.0134689;>?ACD G#*9FbQX/257:=@BUnknown KARANGIZI6=@F!t!tl,b$u1"9 ٬-#=a@0(  B S  ?TMO/S:SSTTTTTTTTTToK#KSSSTTTTTTTTTT KARANGIZI>C:\WINDOWS\Desktop\Regional Procurement Reform Initiative.doc KARANGIZI\C:\My Documents\PROCUREMENT\Dar paper -redlined Regional Procurement Reform Initiative.doc KARANGIZI\C:\My Documents\PROCUREMENT\Dar paper -redlined Regional Procurement Reform Initiative.doc KARANGIZI\C:\My Documents\PROCUREMENT\Dar paper -redlined Regional Procurement Reform Initiative.doc KARANGIZI\C:\My Documents\PROCUREMENT\Dar paper -redlined Regional Procurement Reform Initiative.doc KARANGIZI\C:\My Documents\PROCUREMENT\Dar paper -redlined Regional Procurement Reform Initiative.doc KARANGIZIVC:\My Documents\PROCUREMENT\Regional Procurement Reform Initiative - S. Karangizi.doc KARANGIZIVC:\My Documents\PROCUREMENT\Regional Procurement Reform Initiative - S. Karangizi.doc KARANGIZIJC:\windows\TEMP\Regional Procurement Reform Initiative - S. Karangizi.docPatricia Kabuleeta\\Lawinstitute\d\Programs\SEMINAR ADMIN 2003\WORLD BANK CONFERENCE JANUARY 2003\WORKSHOP PAPERS\Speakers Papers in sessions\Session 1 - Regional Procurement Reform Initiative.doc.7M:>x  Wk O44 +z lNQbzYv.D!!]"(|# 8'$ mMY& %3'dҖf"( l( 6[T,dR]/Ke1(?*+3BXT5 |8|+@< @jJG~'f!HR5W?HF"u]$K ,|K0^$MLMaxaMCQ$i>Qnq'U6N?aX$C+_B&f>Ri.=FDi>[fjtA&6l@,c2m Zdp"YCr~4vCtZFQcPv o(o(.0o(..88o(... 88o( .... `o( ..... `o( ...... o(....... o(........zo(.0o(..0o(...88o(.... 88o( ..... `o( ...... `o(....... o(........ ppo(.........hho(. hhOJQJo( hhOJQJo(hh)0o(()h 56o(()h.hpLp.h@ @ .h.hL.h.h.hPLP.o(()hh5o(hh5o(.05o(..885o(... 885o( .... `5o( ..... `5o( ...... 5o(....... 5o(........ hhOJQJo(hh.hh)0o(- hhOJQJo(hh)xo(xo(.`0`o(..o(... XXo( .... `o( ..... P`Po( ......   o(....... H H o(........No(No(.0o(..88o(... 88o( .... `o( ..... `o( ...... o(....... o(........ho(.0o(..0o(...88o(.... 88o( ..... `o( ...... `o(....... o(........ ppo(.........o(()  . L .xx.HH.L...L.hh)o(()  . L .xx.HH.L...L.hh)0o(0o(.0o(..88o(... 88o( .... `o( ..... `o( ...... o(....... o(........ 56o(().pLp.@ @ ..L...PLP.o(o(.0o(..88o(... 88o( .... `o( ..... `o( ...... o(....... o(........o(o(.0o(..88o(... 88o( .... `o( ..... `o( ...... o(....... o(........hh)0o(-p0po(-ko(()0o(.0o(..0o(...88o(.... 88o( ..... `o( ...... `o(....... o(........ ppo(.........o(()   56o(() L .xx.HH.L...L.0o(0o(.0o(..88o(... 88o( .... `o( ..... `o( ...... o(....... o(........0o(0o(.0o(..88o(... 88o( .... `o( ..... `o( ...... o(....... o(........0o(0o(.0o(..88o(... 88o( .... `o( ..... `o( ...... o(....... o(........0o(.0o(..0o(...88o(.... 88o( ..... `o( ...... `o(....... o(........ ppo(.........ddo(.0o(..0o(...88o(.... 88o( ..... `o( ...... `o(....... o(........ ppo(.........0o(0o(.0o(..88o(... 88o( .... `o( ..... `o( ...... o(....... o(........PPo(.0o(..0o(...88o(.... 88o( ..... `o( ...... `o(....... o(........ ppo(.........0o(. hhOJQJo(hho(.h 56o(()h.hpLp.h@ @ .h.hL.h.h.hPLP.0o(.zo(.0o(..88o(... 88o( .... `o( ..... `o( ...... o(....... o(........ hhOJQJo(.O44c2mcPv#Wk f"(@vCtDi>x ZdpR]/mMY&!]"8'$T5u]$Kl(+@<,|K+z%3'&fDMlNQe17Rif!H[fj6[T,5W?HaMCQM$MC+_?aXY?*+3YCr>QJG|8'U&6l.@TP@G:Times New Roman5Symbol3& :Arial;Wingdings#1hq&q&*l E#\0dTvProgress Report , COMESA Public Procurement Reform Project, Stephen Karangizi, Project Coordinator, COMESA Secretariat KARANGIZIPatricia Kabuleeta Oh+'0$8DT p|    wProgress Report , COMESA Public Procurement Reform Project, Stephen Karangizi, Project Coordinator, COMESA Secretariatrog KARANGIZIepARANormalZPatricia KabuleetaO2trMicrosoft Word 8.0O@F#@\7@.@.  E ՜.+,D՜.+,d hp  CCOMESA#Tj wProgress Report , COMESA Public Procurement Reform Project, Stephen Karangizi, Project Coordinator, COMESA Secretariat Title 6> _PID_GUIDAN{65088700-06F9-11D7-81F8-444553540000}  !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqstuvwxy{|}~Root Entry Fc 1TableFWWordDocument%SummaryInformation(rDocumentSummaryInformation8zCompObjjObjectPool    FMicrosoft Word Document MSWordDocWord.Document.89q